Shri Bhagwan vs Secretary Of State And Anr.
Judges:
19 December, 1938·3. By deducting this two months' period the suit i;5 within one year from 30th December 1935. The suit is therefore not time barred. As regards the frame of the suit there can be no doubt that the suit was filed against the Secretary of State for India in Council as it should have been. What has hap...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
District Board vs Captain H. Trotter
Judges:
19 December, 1938·3. The previous sanction of the Governor. General, as required by Sub-section 3 of Section 80-A, Government of India Act, then in force, was obtained to the passing of the U.P. District Boards Act (10 of 1922). That being so, the Local Government was entitled to enact the Sections which authorize th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lala Dwarka Das vs Godhana And Ors.
Judges:
16 December, 1938·JUDGMENT Verma, J. 1. The appellant before us was the plaintiff in the suit which was for partition of his share in certain buildings. The plaintiff has purchased the share of one of the members of the family which owned this house. A preliminary decree for partition was passed on 30th January 1933....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pt. Shyam Lal vs Lakshmi Narain And Ors.
Judges:
15 December, 1938·5. The objection which has been taken to the acknowledgment is that it is not admissible in evidence because the mortgage deed of 1930 has not been proved in accordance with Section 68, Evidence Act. The plaintiff called an attesting witness Amanatullah and he made a statement which was unsatisfacto...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gusain Singh And Ors. vs Puran Singh And Ors.
Judges:
15 December, 1938·2. The defendants denied that the plaintiffs had any such right, and inter alia contended that the suit was not cognizable by the Civil Court. Both the lower Courts have concurrently found that the suit is cognizable by the Revenue Court and not by the Civil Court, and have dismissed the suit. Rule ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Haldhar Upadhya vs Ram Sumer Upadhya And Anr.
Judges:
14 December, 1938·JUDGMENT Verma, J. 1. The appellant before us was defendant 1 in the suit, which was for the demolition of certain constructions which according to the plaint had been put up by the appellant in plots Nos. 343, 344 and 345. The trial Court dismissed the suit, but the lower Appellate Court has decree...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bansraj Pandey vs Ram Lal Pandey And Anr.
Judges:
14 December, 1938·5. The position thus is this Ram Lal Pande contested the case on the allegation that ho was a purchaser for value in good faith and that the order prohibiting the judgment-debtor from transferring the property in any way and other persons from taking any benefit from such transfer having been procla...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bibi Amna Khatoon Begum And Ors. vs Beni Ram And Ors.
Judges:
12 December, 1938·1. This is a plaintiffs' Letters Patent Appeal against the decision of a learned single Judge of this Court. It arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiffs against the defendants-respondents to recover arrears of rent. The defendants are thekadars. There was no dispute about the amount of arrears...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kashi Nath vs Municipal Board
Judges:
12 December, 1938·I am thus clearly of opinion that a Court of law will be not justified in granting a mandatory injunction in a case like this; firstly because the Court is not capable of enforcing it and secondly because to award damages is certainly an efficacious remedy. 4. As regards the statutory duty of the de...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kamla Prasad Ram Pandey vs Hasan Ali Khan
Judges:
09 December, 1938·sud mo sud dar sud upar asal har shash mahi ke aj ki tarikh se taroz wasul kul mutalba ke bashrah do rupaiya mahwar.... 2. The signature of the defendant is in Hindi and Is similar to the writing in which the form wart filled in. It is clear therefore that the blank in the form between the words "ba...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.