Hakim Kanhaiya Prasad vs Mt. Hamidan And Ors.
Judges:
29 April, 1938·I the mortgagor shall be responsible for the repairs to the house mortgaged. The mortgagee shall have nothing to do therewith. In case the mortgagee has to spend anything, I the executant, shall be liable for payment of the same. 5. Clause (4) states: If during the stipulated period, the mortgagee i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bishan Singh Gaur vs I.P.R. Sherred And Anr.
Judges:
29 April, 1938·3. It appears that in Sambat 1880 corresponding to 1882 A.D., Mr. Traill, the then Commissioner of Kumaun, fixed the boundaries of the villages in Kumaun. These boundaries are known as sal assi boundaries and are referred to at p. 168 of Mr. Stowell's book (1937 edition). It is stated, in the book t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Har Prasad vs Sewa And Ors.
Judges:
29 April, 1938·2. As we have stated this agreement was entered into on 17th July 1934 and it is clear that the sugarcane crop mentioned in the agreement would not be in a fit state to be harvested and ready for delivery until the end of January or the beginning of February 1935. It appears that the judgment-debtor...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Makhan Lal Kela And Anr. vs Baldeo Prasad And Ors.
Judges:
26 April, 1938·3. Learned Counsel for the appellants has urged before me that the order of the Court on the basis of the above mentioned compromise was ultra vires and the Court had no jurisdiction to pass it. According to learned Counsel's argument, Kunj Behari Lall is still the owner of the property in suit and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Qaim Husain vs L. Pirbhu Lal And Anr.
Judges:
26 April, 1938·It does not appear to their Lordships that, in order to entitle him to recover full indemnity for the wrongful attachment of his goods, the respondent is bound to allege and prove that the appellants resisted applications maliciously, and without probable cause. 2. In that case, an application had b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Major A.U. John vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges:
25 April, 1938·(2) If the answer to part (a) of question (1) is in the affirmative and to part (b) in the negative, was the Assistant Commissioner justified in holding that the item must be deemed to have been paid to the assessee on the day he deposited the sum of Rs. 26,000 representing the difference between th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Allahabad Bank Ltd. vs Benaras Bank Ltd. And Ors.
Judges:
25 April, 1938·3. The contention that the defendant Bank had priority with respect to a sum of Rs. 3,00,000 was not pressed at the trial and we are not concerned with the same in this appeal. The defendant Bank however maintained that it had priority over the plaintiff's claim with respect to a sum of Rs. 1,25,000...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Major A. U. John, In Re. vs Unknown
Judges:
25 April, 1938·As is stated in the Reference, there were no cash proceeds of the sale since the mills were knocked down to be debenture holders for the sum of Rs. 20,80,000. This sum of Rs. 20,80,000 was set off against the decretal amount. Under Rule 2, Chapter 17, of the General Rules (Civil) of 1911 poundage wa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagdeo Singh vs Mahabir Singh And Ors.
Judges:
23 April, 1938·1. This is an appeal by a plaintiff whose claim for pre-emption has been dismissed by both the Courts below. On 2nd August 1933, defendants 1 to 3 executed a document purporting to be a deed of usufructuary mortgage in favour of defendant 4, for a sum of Rs. 1000. The plaintiff's case was that the t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ch. Pahlad Singh vs Niadar Singh And Anr.
Judges:
21 April, 1938·Whether in an appeal for reduction of the amount adjudicated by the trial Court in a suit under Section 33, Agriculturists' Relief Act, to be due from the appellant to the respondent ad valorem court-fee should be charged on the amount by which reduction is sought, and if not, what is the court-fee ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.