Kali Charan Ram Saithwar And Ors. vs Banka Chand And Ors.
Judges:
20 October, 1936·1. This is a second appeal by the defendants against the decree of the lower appellate Court granting the suit of the plaintiffs in terms of relief in para. (a). The facts are simple. One Mahabir Chand owned a six annas share in mahal No. 9 of mauza Atsia. He died many years ago and was succeeded by...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ghasitey Mal vs Har Prasad And Anr.
Judges:
20 October, 1936·2. The defence taken on behalf of Har Prasad and the minor Ram Dayal, was that Pancham was not the owner of the House and had no right to mortgage the house, and that the house had been exclusively acquired by Har Prasad out of his own funds. The trial Court found that the house in question had been...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nadir Husain And Ors. vs Municipal Board And Anr.
Judges: Sulaiman, Bennet
16 October, 1936·2. It is contended on behalf of the appellants that the decree of the High Court involved both directly and indirectly a claim or question as to and respecting property of the value of Rs. 10,000 because the value of the mortgaged property sought to be sold exceeds Rs. 10,000. On behalf of the respo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: R, A Mukhtar vs Unknown
Judges:
16 October, 1936·2. That this Court has power to reinstate a legal practitioner dismissed for misconduct can admit of no doubt and the learned Government Advocate, who appeared to oppose this application, did not contend that, if this is a proper case, the Court is prevented by any rule of law from reinstating the a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nadir Husain And Ors. vs Municipal Board And Anr.
Judges:
16 October, 1936·2. It is contended on behalf of the appellants that the decree of the High Court involved both directly and indirectly a claim or question as to and respecting property of the value of Rs. 10,000 because the value of the mortgaged property sought to be sold exceeds Rs. 10,000. On behalf of the respo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hakim Moin Uddin vs Shiekh Abdus Samad
Judges:
14 October, 1936·(1) If it is shown to the satisfaction of a board that any building or place within the limits of the Municipality which any person uses or intends to use as factory or other place of business of the manufacture, storage, treatment or disposal of any article, by reason of such use, or by reason of s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Baryar Singh vs Ram Dularay
Judges:
14 October, 1936·1. This is a civil revision by a judgment-debtor raising the question of the interpretation of Section 30, Sub-section (2), U.P., Agriculturists' Belief Act (Act 17 of 1934). The following dates are relevant : On 19th January 1929 the judgment-debitor executed a simple mortgage for Rs. 300 at 2 per ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
(Raja) Veni Madho Prasad Singh vs M. Wazid Ali
Judges:
13 October, 1936·3. The defendant produced evidence to show that the statements made were true, and we have been taken over some of this evidence, and the Court below has come to the conclusion that the defendant had reasonable and probable cause for making the statements complained of. But the Court stated on p. 41...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lala Ram Sarup vs Musammat Kaniz Ummehani
Judges: Sulaiman, Bennet
12 October, 1936·1. A preliminary objection is taken to the hearing of this appeal that no Letters Patent Appeal lies. In a suit for a declaration that certain property was not liable to attachment and sale, an injunction was, granted by the Court below. As the valuation of the suit was more than Rs. 50,000, a first...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
L. Ram Sarup vs Mt. Kaniz Ummehani
Judges:
12 October, 1936·1. A preliminary objection is taken to the hearing of this appeal that no Letters Patent appeal lies. In a suit for a declaration that certain property was not liable to attachment and sale an injunction was granted by the Court below. As the valuation of the suit was more than Rs. 5,000, a first ap...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.