Deokinandan vs Emperor
Judges:
14 May, 1936·4. On the other hand, the preponderance of authority appears to be in favour of the view that the words "police officer" in the Indian Evidence Act should be given a more liberal interpretation and a wider meaning than that indicated by their technical sense. The authority for the latter view is the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Munna Lal vs Municipal Board
Judges:
12 May, 1936·(1) No objection shall be taken to a valuation of assessment, nor shall the liability of a person to be assessed or taxed be questioned in any other manner or by any other authority than is provided in this Act; (2) the order of the appellate authority confirming, setting aside or modifying an order...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Manbhari vs Pt. Sri Ram
Judges:
12 May, 1936·2. Whilst he held that the property had passed by means of this sale deed to Sri Earn, and that consequently the latter was entitled to possession and damages, he further held that it was only equitable that Sri Ram should pay the balance of the purchase price, less damages, and he made such payment...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Piyare Lal vs Hasan Ahmad
Judges:
12 May, 1936·2. Inasmuch however, as the mortgagee was a Mahomedan, a subsequent agreement was entered into between the parties whereby the mortgagor bound her. self to pay annually a fixed sum of money in lieu of the offerings, and also, in case of default, to pay interest thereon. Default having been made, the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Sheo Kumari And Ors. vs Mathura Ram
Judges:
12 May, 1936·1. This is a Letters Patent appeal arising out of proceedings taken by Mathura Ram under Section 25, Guardians and "Wards Act. 2. The facts which have given rise to these proceedings can very briefly be stated as follows: Mathura Ram instituted a suit in the civil Court for restitution of conjugal r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Suraj Pali vs Ariya Pretinidhi Sabha
Judges:
11 May, 1936·In view of this ruling I consider that I should hold that the refusal to allow an amendment of the plaint is a case decided within the meaning of Section 115, Civil P.C. 4. The learned Judge obviously felt bound to follow the Bench ruling as no ruling to the contrary was cited before him. On the oth...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chunna Mal vs Bhagwant Kishore
Judges:
11 May, 1936·5. Their Lordships then proceeded to consider what would be the right principle governing a case which was not so provided in the statute and pointed out that: Although the analogy is not perfect, what has happened is not at all unlike that which so commonly happens in practice in the Indian Courts,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shikar Chand vs Shankar Lal And Ors.
Judges:
08 May, 1936·1. This is an appeal by a plaintiff who brought a claim for the recovery of a certain amount paid by him on account of earnest money to defendants 1 and 2. The transaction that culminated in the suit was with respect to certain grain-pits in the town of Deoband. It is common ground that Asa Ram, def...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Kulsoomun Nissa And Anr. vs Noor Mohammad Alias Sultan Haider ...
Judges:
08 May, 1936·2. The second ground on which the lower appellate Court has dismissed the suit is that under Section 4, Pensions Act (23 of 1871), no civil Court can entertain any suit relating to any pension or grant of money or land revenue conferred or made by the British or any former Government, except as prov...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rameshwar Nath vs Mt. Aftab Begam And Anr.
Judges:
05 May, 1936·3. The learned Subordinate Judge did not decide the question of the valuation of the suit and considered the case upon its merits He found as a fact that the dower due to the plaintiff was Rs. 30,000 and that such dower was prompt. He further found that at the date of this transfer to the plaintiff,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.