Shyam Lal vs Bahal Rai
Judges:
03 February, 1936·The judgment-debtor Shyam Lal objects. I have heard counsels for both parties. The application of the decree-holder is proper and maintainable: vide Jogemaya Dasi v. Baidyanath 1919 46 Cal 245. The objection of the judgment-debtor has no force. I allow the application, and order under Order 38, Rule...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Khiali Ram vs Bucha Ram
Judges:
02 February, 1936·ORDER Allsop, J. 1. This is an application for ex-tension of time for depositing a certain sum of money. The applicant was one of three defendants in a suit in a Court of Small Causes. He was not present when the suit was heard and decided but the other two co-defendants were present. The suit was f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.