Hafiz Mohd. Rafiq Ahmad vs Emperor
Judges:
06 February, 1936·1. These are two applications in revision. The applicant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months on two counts, i.e., for receiving and retaining two stolen bicycles knowing or having reason to believe that they were stolen. It is argued in the first place that the learned ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hamid Ullah vs Ahmad Ullah
Judges:
06 February, 1936·2. In that case a lady had gifted to her daughter some share in revenue paying villages together with land, houses and moveables. Further on. in the judgment their Lordships observed: The lady had merely proprietary not actual possession of the greater portion of the property that is to say, she was...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Jaffo vs Chitta And Ors.
Judges:
06 February, 1936·In all suits regarding inheritance, succession, marriage, and caste and other usages and institutions, the laws of the Quran with respect to Mahomedans and those of the Shastras with respect to Gentoos (Hindus) shall be invariably adhered to. 7. The Regulating Act of 1773 under which the Supreme Cou...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Gopal vs Mt. Ganga Devi
Judges:
05 February, 1936·Kallu Khan and Babbu Khan tenants and raiyats, were originally the owners of the house standing on the land in dispute. They left the village 17 years before April 1887. The defendant's father occupied the house on their behalf and used to repair it in lieu of rent. Kallu Khan's son Babbu Khan was i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dhara Singh vs Bharat Singh
Judges:
05 February, 1936·6. Given a joint Hindu family owning property, there is no presumption that such property is ancestral. Such is the view expressed in Mulla's Hindu Law, Edn. 6, p. 248, and that is the view which has been adopted by their Lordships of the Privy Council in Shadi Lal v. Lal Bahadur 1933 ALJ 339. At p....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
S. Zahoor Muhammad Khan vs Dr. M.X. De-Noronha And Ors.
Judges: Harries, Bajpai
04 February, 1936·2. The plaintiff appealed to the lower Appellate Court and while the appeal was pending W. C. de Noronha, senior, happened to die and an application for substitution was made more than 90 days after the death. The application for substitution was opposed and it was said that the appeal had abated. T...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Tijjo vs Chiranjilal
Judges:
03 February, 1936·2. Shankar Lal died about the year 1926 and then dispute arose. Chiranji Lal, the natural father of Shankar Lal, claimed the properties of Makhan Lal as heir to his own son, Shankar Lal. His case was that Shankar Lal had been adopted by Makhan Lal and on Shankar Lal's death, he (Chiranji Lal) was en...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M. Kishan Lal vs Mohammad Ishaq And Ors.
Judges:
03 February, 1936·1. This is a plaintiff's second appeal arising out of a suit for declaration. The facts which have given rise to this appeal can briefly be stated as follows: One Mt. Ganga Devi was in possession of a certain share as a Hindu female to which she succeeded as such on the death of her mother. She obta...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jia Lal vs Emperor
Judges:
03 February, 1936·1. This is an application by Jia Lal against an order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Meerut, upholding his conviction by a special Magistrate under Section 420, I.P.C. Originally no less than five persons were prosecuted for conspiracy to cheat under Sections 420/120-B, I.P.C. They were two b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Tijjo vs Chiranji Lal
Judges: R Singh
03 February, 1936·3. Shankar Lal died about the year 1926 and then dispute arose. Chiranji Lal, the natuaral father of Shankar Lal, claimed the properties of Makhan Lal as heir to his own son, Shankar Lal. His case was that Shankar Lal had been adopted by Makhan Lal and on Shankar Lal's death, he (Chiranji Lal) was e...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.