Shyam Narain Misir And Anr. vs Mangal Prasad Misir And Ors.
Judges:
12 September, 1934·3. The learned advocate for the plaintiffs urges before us that Section 43, T.P. Act, cannot apply to a case where a person, who is a mere contingent reversioner, purports to transfer the property and then subsequently succeeds to it. The argument is that such an interpretation of Section 43 would b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Sahai And Ors. vs Uttama Debi And Ors.
Judges:
12 September, 1934·3. In 1934 the path was again blocked and this time it was blocked by certain brambles. The applicants before me applied to a Magistrate for taking proceedings under Section 133, Criminal P.C., against Srimati Uttama Debi, Chaudhari Raghubir Narain Singh and Ratan Lal. Srimati Uttama Debi in pursuan...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Habibur Razzaq vs Ram Sarup And Anr.
Judges:
10 September, 1934·No action such as is described in Sub-section (1) shall, unless it is an action for the recovery of immovable property or for a declaration of title thereto, be commenced otherwise than within six months next after the accrual of the cause of action. 3. The lower Courts held that the suit was barred...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rurmal Ram Nath vs Kapil Man Misir And Ors.
Judges:
07 September, 1934·I do not express any opinion as regards the question whether if an application for leave to sue as a pauper is granted, a definite proceeding should be considered to terminate with the order granting such application so as to amount to a case having been decided; but if the application for sue to su...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Zabaishi Begam vs Naziruddin Khan And Ors.
Judges:
06 September, 1934·5. The Court below overruled all the pleas urged in defence. It held that Shafat Begam did not execute the deed of relinquishment; that Shafat Begam was in receipt of the profits of her share in her lifetime; that the defendants were not in adverse possession of the property in dispute and the suit ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muhammad Yusuf And Ors. vs Muhammad Shafi And Ors.
Judges:
04 September, 1934·2. Defendants 1 and 2, are the sons of Ahmad Ali and defendant 3 is his nephew. Defendant 4 is a son of Ghulam Husain and defendants 5 to 7 are descendants of Allah Rakhu, the founder of the Imambara. The defence is that Allah Rakhu who admittedly founded the Imambara in dispute treated it as his ow...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: (Thirteen) Advocates vs Unknown
Judges:
03 September, 1934·ORDER 1. The Advocates' Association has brought to the notice of the High Court two election manifestos circulated by two advocates of this Court among their fellow practitioners as part of election campaigns in connexion with the last Bar Council elections. "With respect to one of these, contempt p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Powdhari vs Mt. Ram Sanwari And Ors.
Judges:
03 September, 1934·2. Following certain earlier decisions of the Patna High Court, a learned Judge of this Court in Mt. Hubraji v. Balkaran Singh 1933 All. 11, expressed the opinion that when once notice has been issued by the Court under Order 44, Rule 1, Civil P.C., the Court cannot fall back on the proviso to JJ. 1...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M. Maqbul Ahmad vs Mt. Fatma Bibi And Ors.
Judges:
03 September, 1934·2. The plaintiff and his deceased brother Nehal Ahmad were joint owners of certain properties which do not appear to have been divided. Nehal Ahmad died sometime before 24th November 1924, leaving a number of heirs, some of whom were minors. The plaintiff managed the entire property and all the affa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.