Ganga Prasad vs Prabhat Dayal
Judges:
22 October, 1934·ORDER Bennet, J. 1. This is an application in. civil revision by a defendant against a decree of the Small Cause Court. The plaint alleged that the plaintiff had given gold and silver to the defendant, a sonar, to make into ornaments. In para. 3 of the plaint it was stated that after a week the plai...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chanar Singh Jai Ram vs Chanar Singh Jeet Singh
Judges:
22 October, 1934·2. Further evidence was admitted and the lower appellate Court has come to a further finding which is to the effect that the defendant has not acquired the title of a mortgagee by adverse possession. The case has now been reargued as to whether this finding is-correct in point of law on the facts fo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanhaiya Lal vs Mt. Champa Devi
Judges:
22 October, 1934·1. This is a second appeal by a plaintiff who sues for possession of a certain house which he purchased by a sale-deed of 25th June 1929, from one Kishun Lal, the eon of the sister of Hulasi. It is found by the lower appellate Court that Hulasi was the last male owner of the house. The defendants we...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gauri Dayal vs Emperor
Judges:
20 October, 1934·3. It has been found that Babu Gaya Prasad, Station Master opened the lock at point No. 3 in order to admit the goods wagon on line No. 3. Babu Gaya Prasad should have locked the point No. 3 before he was relieved, but it has been found that when he was relieved he left this point No. 3 unlocked. Th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Yunis vs Tilok Chand And Ors.
Judges:
10 October, 1934·4. Then on 5th September 1929, the plaintiffs-respondents filed an application for preparation of a final decree under Order 34, Rule 5 Civil P.C. In this application it was admitted that the right to apply for the preparation of final decree accrued to the plaintiffs on 31st July 1925, by which dat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: An Advocate Of Allahabad vs Unknown
Judges:
09 October, 1934·It is a summary process and should be used only from a sense of duty and under the pressure of public necessity, for there can be no landmarks pointing out the boundaries in all cases. Committals for contempt of Court by scandalising the Court itself have become obsolete in this country. 5. The conc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lachhoo vs (Firm) Munnilal-Babu Lal
Judges:
05 October, 1934·3. Lachhmi Narain then brought the present suit under Order 21, Rule 63, Civil P.C., and this suit in spite of the objections of the defendant, was decreed by the Courts below. The second appeal filed by the defendant was allowed by a learned Single Judge of this Court who held that the suit was not...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lachhoo vs Firm Munni Lal-Babu Lal
Judges: Sulaiman, Bajpai
05 October, 1934·4. Lachhmi Narain then brought the present suit under Order XXI, Rule 63, of the Civil Procedure Code, and this suit in spite of the objections of the defendant, was decreed by the Courts below. The second appeal filed by the defendant was allowed by a learned Single Judge of this Court who held tha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Akhlaq Ahmad And Ors. vs Mt. Karam Ilahi
Judges:
04 October, 1934·4. The Court approved the decision in Radha Krishna v. Ram Narain 1931 All. 369. It will be observed that in that case the documents had not been executed by the plaintiff him self, but by certain unspecified deceased members of the family. The case of Kalu Ram v. Babu Lal 1932 All. 485, was decided...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanta Tewari And Anr. vs Sheo Narain Lal And Ors.
Judges:
04 October, 1934·1. This is a defendant's appeal arising out of a suit for possession of land, removal of certain constructions put upon it by the defendants and for damages and induction. The first Court dismissed the plaintiffs' claim; but on appeal the lower appellate Court has decreed it. Its findings are unfort...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.