Ajodhya Pandey vs Mt. Rajna And Ors.
Judges:
08 March, 1934·JUDGMENT Kendall, J. 1. This is a defendant's appeal from a decree and order of the Second Additional Subordinate Judge of Jaunpur confirming the decision of the trial Court. The facts are given sufficiently fully in the judgment of the lower appellate Court, and the only question that I have to dec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
(Rai) Govind Chand vs Gajadhar
Judges:
08 March, 1934·2. The trial Court struck a number of issues arising from the plaint and the written statement of Bijai Mai. No order seems to have been passed on the application of Gajadhar. Probably the trial Court intended to take notice of it in its judgment. This was not however done, and the issues having all...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Emperor vs Nur Ahmad
Judges:
08 March, 1934·4. The accused in his defence led evidence to show that he was not the licensee of the shop in which the ghee was bought. The licensee is his brother Azimuddin. This fact is not disputed by the prosecution. The accused further led evidence to prove that he is engaged in selling fruit in front of the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Alley Rasul Ali Khan And Anr. vs Balkishun And Ors.
Judges:
08 March, 1934·1. This is a reference by the learned Commissioner and District Judge of Ajmer-Merwara, purporting to have been made under Section 17 of Regulation 1 of 1877. Several preliminary points have been taken by Mr. Banerji on behalf of the opposite party contending that the reference is not competent. His...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jawahar Lal vs Mathura Prasad And Anr.
Judges:
07 March, 1934·12. In Mohan Lal v. Tilea Ram A.I.R. 1918 All. 55 also there was a bond payable by instalments which provided that the creditor would have the power (ikhtiyar) to recover the whole amount in case of default. A learned Judge of this Court held that inasmuch as the suit was for recovery of the last th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jangali Tewari vs Naubat Tewari And Ors.
Judges:
07 March, 1934·2. If the suit comes under this section, Schedule 4, Group B, No. 15, bars the Civil Court from having jurisdiction to hear it. According to the Full Bench decision of In re Ananti v. Chhannu A.I.R. 1930 All. 193, the jurisdiction of the Court is decided by the-plaint. The defence cannot be looked a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jamuna Dube vs Mathura Rai And Ors.
Judges:
07 March, 1934·1. This is a second appeal by a plaintiff whose suit for a declaration was dismissed by the lower appellate Court. The plaintiff purchased a certain zamindari share of 3 gandas odd which had be longed to the defendants in a certain patti by auction-sale on the 23rd October 1914 and obtained possessi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dip Chand vs Emperor
Judges:
07 March, 1934·ORDER Bajpai, J. 1. The accused, Dip Chand, was charged under Section 353, Penal Code, the allegation being that he gave two or three slaps to a canal patrol. The facts are that the naib tahsildar had gone to village Malikpur to make collections of land revenue and canal dues. Certain persons includ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lalji Sahai And Anr. vs Parsottam Ahir And Ors.
Judges:
07 March, 1934·JUDGMENT Bennet, J. 1. This is a second appeal by defendants 1 and 2 against a decree of the lower appellate Court in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff brought a suit for declaration that he was the sole owner of a certain shop and that defendants second set, that is, defendants 3 and 4 had no ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash vs Jugal Kishore
Judges:
06 March, 1934·1. This is a plaintiffs' appeal from a decree and order of the learned District Judge of Moradabad, reversing the decision of the trial Court in a suit filed by the plaintiff's under Section 222, Agra Tenancy Act, 1926. The plaintiffs sued as co-sharers, and the defence raised by the defendants was ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.