Basdeo Sahai And Ors. vs Man Singh And Ors.
Judges:
15 March, 1934·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal against a decree and order of the Additional Subordinate Judge of Bulandshahr, modifying the decision of the trial Court. The suit was one brought by a zamindar for recovery of the price of kankar which had been dug up from the land in the occupancy holding of the def...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Jan Khan vs Mt. Sundar And Anr.
Judges:
15 March, 1934·1. This is a second appeal from the decision of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge of Bareilly. The plaintiff took a transfer of a house by a sale from a sweeper woman. The only question in this case is whether that sweeper woman was the wife of the man she lived with and so could transfer leg...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Wazir Singh vs Nagar
Judges:
14 March, 1934·1. This is an application for revision of an order by a Revenue Court to the following effect: he arbitrator has not taken any evidence and has not determined any issue. This award is thus materially irregular. It is therefore sat aside. 2. This order was passed in a suit for arrears of rent amounti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Collector Of Meerut vs Chaudhary Risal Singh
Judges:
14 March, 1934·calling upon all persons. having claims, including decrees for money, whether secured by mortgage or not, against the ward or his pro-party, to notify the same to the Collector, within six months of the publication of the notice. The question then is, whether the claim of the respondent is a "claim ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chedi Lal vs Mt. Insar Begam
Judges:
14 March, 1934·In the case of every mabal the entire mahal and all the proprietors jointly and severally shall be responsible to Government for the revenue for the time being assessed on the mahal. 3. Now, this section has been altered in the Land Revenue Act, 3 of 1901 and is as follows Section 142: All the propr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Narain vs Town Area Panchayat
Judges: Young
14 March, 1934·1. This is a second appeal from the decision of the learned Subordinate Judge of Farrukhabad. The plaintiff, who is the mukhtar, practising in Chhibramau Tehsil, was assessed under the Town Area Act by the local panchayat and taxed as an occupier of land under Section 14 of the said Act. He appealed...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Narain vs Town Area Panchayat
Judges:
14 March, 1934·1. This is a second appeal from the decision of the learned Subordinate Judge of Farrukhabad. The plaintiff, who is the mukhtar, practising in Chhibramau Tehsil, was assessed under the Town Areas Act by the local panchayat and taxed as an occupier of land under Section 14 of the said Act. He appeale...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narotam vs Mt. Tapesra And Anr.
Judges:
14 March, 1934·1. This appeal is directed against an order of the Court below appointing Mt. Tapesra as guardian of the person of Mt. Piyari minor. Mt. Tapesra is the own sister of Mt. Piyari. Sita Ram the father of Tapesra and Piyari died in the year 1931. Narotam the appellant before us professes to be the real ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chotey Lall vs Ganpat Rai And Anr.
Judges:
13 March, 1934·11. The very use of the word "deemed" indicates that the Legislature recognised that strictly speaking a Hindu son does not inherit the joint family property from his father, that he is not the legal representative of his deceased ancestor and is not in the ordinary sense liable to pay the debt unde...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nanak vs Faqir Chand
Judges: Kendall
13 March, 1934·2. It is argued that the first default occurred in January 1925, and that there were several defaults afterwards, but that the respondent did not take any steps to enforce the penalty provided in the deed, and that as the case is analogous to that of Sakhawat Husnin v. Gajadhar Prasad 28 A. 622, 3 A...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.