In Re: Jagmandar Das Vaish And Ors. vs Unknown
Judges:
30 March, 1934·1. This is a reference by the Income-tax Commissioner at the instance of an assessee, a Hindu undivided family. The two questions referred are : (1) Whether the unrealized decree of Rs. 23,269 against Talatuf Husain and others entered in the interest Khata is taxable income for the purpose of Income...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Prasad vs Bishambhar Nath And Ors.
Judges:
29 March, 1934·4. Objection is taken to the order of the lower Court on the ground that the application of the plaintiff of the 27th August 1932 merely claims that because the plaintiff may fail to recover the whole amount of his hypothecation decree by the sale of the property therefore the plaintiff has a right ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Dass vs District Judge Of Jhansi
Judges: Mukerji, Bennet
28 March, 1934·1. This is an appeal by one Ram Das against an order of the District Judge of Jhansi refusing to grant letters of administration of him under Section 219 (f) of the Indian Succession Act of 1925. That sub-section lays down: When there is no person connected with the deceased by marriage or consangui...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Das vs Dist. Judge
Judges:
28 March, 1934·1. This is an appeal by one Ram Das against an order of the District Judge of Jhansi refusing to grant letters of administration to him under Section 219(f), Succession Act of 1925. That sub-section lays down: When there is no person connected with the deceased by marriage or consanguinity who is en...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Bhagwati Devi And Anr. vs Gajadhar Prasad
Judges:
23 March, 1934·ORDER Kisch, J. 1. This reference which has been made by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Aligarh arises out of an order under Section 489, Criminal P.C., made by a First Class Magistrate. In a previous proceeding the opposite party had been ordered to pay maintenance to the applicant, his w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
P.L. Jaitley vs Kailash Narain Gupta
Judges:
23 March, 1934·JUDGMENT 1. This is a first appeal from order on an application made by Jaitley and Co., against an advocate who was a receiver of the shop belonging to the appellant. The appellant alleges that the receiver caused damages to the extent of Rs. 1,00,000 during the period that the receiver was in char...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shankar Lal And Ors. vs Shyam Sunder Lal
Judges:
23 March, 1934·1. This is an appeal by certain persons who claimed to be the relations on the father's side of the deceased judgment-debtor, Mt. Ram Devi. The decree-holder, in execution of his decree against Mt. Ram Devi who was alleged to be in possession of her estate as a Hindu daughter had sought to execute t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lachman vs Ratnakar Singh And Ors.
Judges:
22 March, 1934·2. Two rulings were produced on this article One of these rulings, Jai Kishen v. Ram Lal (1898) 20 All. 519 refers to the case of a tenant of an agricultural holding who planted trees on that holding. The other ruling Lach Ram Rao v. Jungi Rai (1911) 12 I.C. 108 refers to the case of mortgagees of a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Padam Prasad vs Shambhu Dayal And Ors.
Judges:
22 March, 1934·1. This is a defendant's appeal against a decree and order of the Subordinate Judge of Meerut, confirming the decision of the trial Court. The plaintiff sued for a declaration that certain property was his property and not attachable in execution of a decree in the following circumstances : The appe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B. Ram Saran Das Johri vs Emperor
Judges:
22 March, 1934·1. These are two criminal revisions: one on behalf of Ramsaran Das Johri, who has been sentenced to 3 months' rigorous imprisonment under Section 18(1) of Act 23 of 1931 read with Sections 15 and 16 of Act 23 of 1932, and the other of Buddhi, who has been sentenced under the same Section 18(1) of ac...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.