Maharaj Kumar Of Vizianagaram, In ... vs Unknown
Judges:
30 January, 1934·The case put forward on behalf of the assessee is that he and the Maharaja are members of undivided Hindu family and that the allowance of Rs. 10,000 a month received by him is paid to him as a member of that family. The Commissioner of Income Tax, on the other hand, maintains that the assessee can ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Maharaj Kumar Of ... vs Unknown
Judges:
30 January, 1934·3. The question which the Commissioner was required by the assessee to refer to this Court for decision were four. The Commissioner thought they had been inartistically framed and did not adopt them for reference to this Court. He framed the question which we have quoted above and which he thought c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Income-Tax Reference Of ... vs Unknown
Judges:
30 January, 1934·The tax shall not be payable by an assessee in respect of any sum which he received as a member of a Hindu undivided family. 4. The case put forward on behalf of the assessee is that he and the Maharaja are members of an undivided Hindu family, and that the allowance of Rs. 10,000 a month received b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagrup Ram Kasaundhan vs Kashi Prasad Gupta And Ors.
Judges:
26 January, 1934·It is therefore held that the award is valid so far as it adjudicates matters between the plaintiff and defendants 1 and 3. As there was no reference by plaintiff and defendant 4, so the matters between them could not be decided by arbitrator. The Court will fix a date for final disposal of the case...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Habibullah Khan vs Bhabuti And Ors.
Judges:
25 January, 1934·2. The defence was that the plot No. 189 was not a grove at all but was a highway in the village and the plaintiff had nothing to do with it; that plot No. 182 was no doubt a grove but it had been planted by some tenants who died heirless and that it had escheated to the zamindar so that the zaminda...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Maida vs Kishan Bahadur Singh And Ors.
Judges:
25 January, 1934·6. It was also alleged that irrespective of the condition of the said agreement, the plaintiffs are, according to law and justice also entitled to have the said amount refunded. 7. Mt. Maida contested the plaintiffs' claim denying the execution of the sale deed in favour of the plaintiffs. She plead...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Badri Das And Ors. vs Mt. Dhanni And Anr.
Judges:
24 January, 1934·1. This is an application for the revision of an order of the learned Munsif of Hathras, giving the plaintiff a decree under Section 9, Specific Belief Act,. 1877. The plaintiff-opposite-party sued for recovery of possession of a house which had been dedicated by his father-in-law for charitable pur...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Phul Chand And Ors. vs Khwaja Tahir Husain
Judges:
24 January, 1934·3. During the pendency of the suit in the Court below, Phul Chand, applicant purchased the rights and interest of Hansraj in the mortgage deed in suit and filed an application in the Court below for being added as a defendant to the suit. On 26th February 1930, the Court ordered that the application...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghunath Ram And Ors. vs Sirtaj And Anr.
Judges:
23 January, 1934·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit for ejectment of the defendants filed in the revenue Court. The plaint, as filed, professed to be one in a suit under Section 44 of Act 3 of 1926. Various pleas were taken in the written statement but the Assistant Collector decreed the claim of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Baij Nath Pathak vs Gaya Din Singh And Ors.
Judges:
23 January, 1934·3. Having lost his case in the Commissioner's Court the defendant executed the Civil Court decree and obtained delivery of possession through the Civil Court on 21st May 1929. Upon this the plaintiff promptly instituted the present suit on 15th June 1929. The Assistant Collector-decreed the claim ho...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.