Mohammad Abdul Karim vs Mohammad Yasin And Anr.
Judges: Niamat Ullah, Bennet
07 February, 1934·That these issues were irrelevant and that he was entitled to succeed on the plaint and the written statement as they stood and that evidence was unnecessary. 6. That has been the attitude of learned Counsel for the plaintiff in this Court. The lower Court, however, heard the evidence of the parties...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Abdul Karim vs Mahammad Yasin
Judges:
07 February, 1934·5. That has been the attitude of Learned Counsel for the plaintiff in this Court. The lower Court however heard the evidence of the parties and gave a decision on the questions of fast raised in the first issue as well as on the question of law. The lower Court found as a matter of fact that the pla...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narain Das Dori Lal vs Mihi Lal And Ors.
Judges:
07 February, 1934·In the case of partners, the partnership property shall be applicable in the first instance in payment of the partnership debts, and the separate property of each partner shall be applicable In the first instance in payment of his separate debts. Where there is a surplus of the separate property of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shankar Lal And Anr. vs Toshan Pal Singh
Judges:
06 February, 1934·3. On the pleadings mentioned above the lower Court struck a number of issues. It is noticeable that no issue was framed as to whether both the defendants were entrusted with the duty of collecting rent from the zamindari property belonging to the family. The reason probably was that defendant 1 was...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tika Ram And Anr. vs Sri Thakur Dooji Maharaj
Judges:
02 February, 1934·1. This is a Letters Patent appeal by the defendants who have lost throughout this litigation. The facts, briefly are these : The land in dispute is now numbered as plot No. 528 and formerly it was numbered as 524. It has a small area. The defendants gave a Qabuliat to the plaintiff in the year 1903...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gajadhar Prasad Ramnath And Anr. vs Lado Ram Gajanand
Judges:
01 February, 1934·2. In the Preamble to the Indian Tariff Act (Act 8 of 1894) it is made clear that it was intended to amend the law relating to the duties of customs on goods imported and exported by sea, and to provide for the levy of duties on goods imported into or exported from British India by land. It is not i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B. Bhairon Prasad vs Ablak Singh And Anr.
Judges:
01 February, 1934·2. The parties led evidence. The first Court was satisfied that the plaintiff had proved the mortgage he set up and decreed redemption. The defendants appealed and that appeal was accepted by the learned subordinate Judge and the suit was dismissed. In this Court it is contended on behalf of the pla...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dhum Bahadur vs Hori Lal
Judges:
01 February, 1934·1. This is a reference by the District Magistrate of Bareilly in which he suggests that the High Court should order a retrial of the accused. The reference has been sent by the District Magistrate through the learned Sessions Judge who agrees with the recommendation of the District Magistrate. The f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.