Har Narain And Ors. vs Hoshiar Singh And Ors.
Judges:
11 December, 1934·2. Section 195(1)(b) provides that no Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Section 193, Penal Code, when such offence is alleged to have been committed in, or in relation to, any proceeding in any Court, except on the complaint, in writing of such Court or of some other Court ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Sakal Mullah And Anr. vs Nageshar Mullah And Anr.
Judges:
10 December, 1934·11. The next case to which I wish to make a reference is Bournmouth Swange Motor Road and Ferry Co. v. Harvey and Sons (1930) A.C. 549. I quote the following passages from the judgment of Lord Maemillan at pp. 552 and 553: My Lords, the question of the precise legal character of ferry is discussed w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Alopi Din vs Emperor
Judges:
10 December, 1934·The Prosecuting Inspector in opening the case said that he wanted to prosecute all the accused under Sections 420, 468 and 120-B, I.P.C. and that there was no case under Section 218, I.P.C. The procedure will therefore be that of a warrant ease. 2. One of the points in revision is that this order sh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Ram Dulari vs Bhola
Judges:
10 December, 1934·Findings : In December 1933, plaintiff 1 died leaving his son, plaintiff 2, as the sole survivor. Owing to the death of plaintiff 1, hearing fixed for 4th December 1933 was adjourned to 9th April 1934. The plaintiff asked for adjournment to 9th April 1934. The plaintiff ' asked for adjournment again...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
P. Mohan Lal Gautam vs Emperor
Judges:
07 December, 1934·4. The pamphlet is addressed to Kisans and calls upon them to unite in order to 'obtain their rights and it is the allegation of the prosecution that it is a document which tends to promote feelings of enmity between Kisans on the one hand and zamindars or the Government on the other and consequentl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Secretary Of State vs Messrs Neaz Ali Hamid Ali
Judges: Bennet
05 December, 1934·1. This is a civil revision on behalf of the defendant, the Secretary of State, representing East Indian Railway against a decree of a Small Cause Court of Agra, in favour of the plaintiff for Rs. 466 damages. Some points were taken by the learned Government Advocate on behalf of the applicant in re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Firm Sant Lal-Mahadeo Prasad vs Kedar Nath
Judges:
05 December, 1934·I set aside the judgment and decree complained of and remand the case to the Munsif in order that he may give ten days' time to the parties, from the date of the information given to the parties of the receipt of the record in his Court to file objections. After the objections if any have been decid...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Waheed Hasan And Ors. vs Abdul Rahman And Ors.
Judges:
04 December, 1934·1. This is a revision application arising out of an application made by the applicants in the Court of the learned District Judge, asking that action under Section 10 of Act 42 of 1923, be taken against the defendants. 2. Waheed Hasan filed an application in the Court of the learned District Judge p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gaekwar, Baroda State Railway ... vs Mohammad Habibullah And Ors.
Judges:
03 December, 1934·in computing the period of limitation prescribed for an appeal for leave to appeal and an application for a review of judgment, the day on which the, judgment complained of was pronounced end the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the decree, sentence or order appealed from or sought to be revie...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.