British India Corporation Ltd. vs Shanti Narain
Judges: T C Corporation Ltd, I R Henceforth, 65, 00, T C 000, 00, 0 C Each, 60 00, 0 O Each, 10, 00, 0 D 81, 0 C Shares, 41, 40, 0 O Shares, 5, 50, 0 D Been, I T 81, 0 P Been, I T 41, 40, 0 O Been, T B Is, 50, D S 000, 19, 0 Preference Shares, 18, 60, 0 O Shares, 4, 50, 0 D Unissued
21 December, 1934·9. Having passed the resolutions referred to above the company decided to register the following minute: The capital of the British India Corporation, Ltd., Cawnpore henceforward is Rs. 3,65,00,000 divided in to 3,00,000 cumulative preference shares of Rs. 100 each and 05,00,000 ordinary shares of R...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ewaz Singh vs Rani Dan Kuar
Judges:
21 December, 1934·1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff whose suit has been dismissed by the lower appellate Court. The facts are that he brought a suit for profits against Thakurain Dan Kuer for the years 1332, 1333 and 1334 fasli on the allegation that he the plaintiff and Thaikuir Drigpal Singh, the husband of Tha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Thakur Bhawani Singh vs Baldeo And Anr.
Judges:
21 December, 1934·1. This is an application in civil revision by a plaintiff whose suit has been dismissed by a Small Cause Court on the ground that the suit is barred by Section 145, Civil P.C. The plaintiff claimed that he had a decree in the Revenue Court against a third party and that in execution a buffalo and c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Deba vs Secy. Of State
Judges:
21 December, 1934·ORDER Bennet, J. 1. This is an application in civil revision by a plaintiff under the following circumstances: The plaintiff brought a suit in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Farrukhabad for arrears of maintenance and a compromise was entered into and a decree was passed in terms of the compro...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sulaiman Husain Khan vs Sita
Judges:
21 December, 1934·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit brought by him for the recovery of a sum of money less than Rs. 500. The suit was decreed by the trial Court but was dismissed by the lower appellate Court. There is therefore a preliminary objection that no second appeal lies because the suit wa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gajadhar Prasad vs Dharma Nand
Judges:
21 December, 1934·Any wages that might be due by MacCorkindale to the plaintiff would be due to him when he left the service on 15th May 1868, and any suit for these wages must, in the absence, of any subsequent accounts stated and settled between the parties, have been brought within three years from 15th May 1868. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajodhya Prasad Dube vs Mahabir And Ors.
Judges:
21 December, 1934·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit brought by him for the recovery of arrears of rent for the years 1333 and 1334 Fasli. The suit was filed upon the allegation that the rent was paid by the defendants in kind. The Court of first instance decreed the plaintiff's suit for about Rs. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sajjanpal Singh And Ors. vs Mt. Harnaraini Kunwar
Judges:
21 December, 1934·5. The dispute which had arisen about the property led to an agreement dated 27th February 1891, by which the questions in issue were referred to arbitration and this agreement was followed by an award dated 2nd April 1891, by which Mt. Hans Kunwar was to remain in possession of all the property dur...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lakhmi Das vs Lakho Ram And Anr.
Judges:
21 December, 1934·1. This is a civil revision by a plaintiff whose suit has been dismissed on preliminary issues by a Small Cause Court. The plaintiff sued on a document dated 30th September 1930, to recover Rs. 365-2-0. The plaintiff alleged that Rs. 400 was due to him from the father of defendants, who was dead at ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
(Firm) Sansarchand Lachhman Das vs Dina Nath Dube
Judges:
20 December, 1934·2. On 5th March 1930 Sansarchand Lachhmandas filed suit No. 729 of 1930 in the Court of small causes at Saharanpur against Dina Nath for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 196-10-0. This claim was formulated in the following manner: It was alleged by them that they purchased goods of the value of Rs. 14,3...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.