Mujtaba Hasan vs Raghubir Saran
Judges:
27 April, 1934·1. This appeal must succeed on the short point that the plaintiff-respondents alone were not entitled to maintain the suit. It appears that there are two classes of people in the village. The plaintiffs are known as zamindars and the defendants as muafidars; while some of the zamindars also hold the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sita Ram And Ors. vs Kamar Uddin And Ors.
Judges:
27 April, 1934·1. This is an appeal by four defendants arising out of a suit which was brought by a lambardar for recovery of arrears of revenue paid by himself in respect of 1335 and 1336 Fasli. There were many defendants in the case but only defendants 40 to 44, contested the suit. The plaintiff's case was that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narotam Das vs Sanwal Dass And Ors.
Judges:
20 April, 1934·1. This is an appeal from the decree passed by the Second Additional Subordinate Judge of Jaunpur upholding the decree passed by the Munsif of Shahganj in a suit brought by the plaintiff-respondent for redemption of certain property. It is no longer in dispute that the original proprietor was one Mo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Indian States Bank Ltd. Official ... vs Kunwar Sardar Singh And Ors.
Judges:
20 April, 1934·12. In the month of September 1930 trouble commenced Bhatnagar, who by this time was secretary of the company, quarreled with Vidyarthi. He was also suspicious of the managing agents and the financial position of the bank. He wished to recover the money that he had invested. As a result of letters t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
L. Madho Ram And Anr. vs Jai Chand Rai And Ors.
Judges:
20 April, 1934·2. On 28th November 1931 Jai Chand Rai and others applied to the learned District Judge that: the order dated 17th August 1931 be set aside and proper directions for the due administration of the trust be ordered and the damages resulting from misfeasance of the trust be recovered from the security ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pandit Hari Kishan Shastir vs Ratan Singh
Judges:
20 April, 1934·1. This is a defendant's appeal against a decision of the District Judge of Kumaun decreeing the plaintiff's suit and reversing the decision of the trial Court. The question that arises in this appeal is whether the interest of a muafidar in Kumaun is transferable. The plaintiff purchased the rights...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Puran Mal And Anr. vs Shiva Lal And Anr.
Judges: Sulaiman, King
19 April, 1934·2. It appears that one Inayat Khan and his three brothers were entitled to 5-6th share in a village, the remaining l-6th belonged to a lady. Instead of mortgaging his l-4th out of the 5-6th, Inayat Khan made a mortgage of 1-4th share in the village to the present plaintiffs. This came to about 17 bi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dhania Kuer And Ors. vs Jai Jai Ram And Ors.
Judges:
18 April, 1934·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit for joint possession of certain plots. The plaintiffs are the inferior proprietors or under-proprietors of the plots and so are the defendants. Neither the tenants nor the superior proprietors are parties to this litigation. The defendants-first-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mitthu Lal vs Mt. Chameli And Anr.
Judges:
17 April, 1934·2. The plaintiffs' case was that Hub Lal was a cosharer of 5 biswas as mortgagee in possession in the years, in suit and that Ram Rachpal w.as a cosharer of 2 biswas, 10 -biswansis-in 1332 and 1333 Fasli and of 2 biswas and 7 1/2 biswansis in 1334 Fasli. 3. The Court of first instance decreed the su...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Umed Singh vs Babu Ram
Judges:
16 April, 1934·2. When a suit was brought by the present plaintiff, the second mortgagee, the vendee pleaded that he was entitled to priority by virtue of the discharge of the first mortgage and he claimed the whole sum of Rs. 6,21.9 which he had paid to the prior mortgagee and also claimed interest on the same at...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.