Mt. Lugdi vs Har Prasad And Anr.
Judges:
07 September, 1933·1. This is a second appeal from the decision of the learned Subordinate Judge of Muttra. The plaintiff, who is an old pardanashin woman, brought a suit in the Court of the Munsif for the sum of Rs. 2,371-11-0 being principal and interest on a sum of money deposited by her with the defendants in the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Maula Bakhsh vs Debi Prasad
Judges:
07 September, 1933·1. This is a second appeal by the plaintiff whose suit for arreas of profits against another co-sharer under Section 165, Agra Tenancy Act (2 of 1901), has been dismissed by an Assistant Collector and also his appeal has been dismissed by the District Judge. The facts set forth in the order of the D...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheikh Ajmeri vs Emperor
Judges:
04 September, 1933·2. On 29th October 1931 the accused's servants brought 22 heads of cattle to Jharnanala and on 30th October 1931 they brought 90 heads of cattle. As regards the 22 heads of cattle brought on the first day and 19 out of 90 heads of cattle-brought on the second day, no octroi receipts were forthcoming...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Narain And Anr. vs Dist. Judge, Shahjahanpur And ...
Judges:
04 September, 1933·No officer or servant shall be dismissed without a reasonable opportunity being given to him of being heard in his own defence, etc. 4. It is clear therefore that it would be open for a dismissed servant to allege that the rule had not been complied with and that therefore he was not legally dismiss...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
V.S. Rm. Lingier vs Ramakrishnaier
Judges: Bardswell
01 September, 1933·JUDGMENT Bardswell, J. 1. The learned District Munsif has dismissed the petitioner's application under Section 73 of the Village Courts Act, for revision of a decree of the Village Munsif, Madura Town, with the words "I see no reason to interfere. Dismissed." The main allegation of the petitioner be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Kishan Das vs Guardian Assurance Company, Ltd.
Judges:
01 September, 1933·2. These are all findings of fact which are conclusive in a second appeal. The question which has been raised in this appeal by the learned Counsel appearing for the defendant-appellant was that there was no valid contract because no premium had been paid. We find ourselves unable to accept this con...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.