Mt. Ram Kali vs Kripa Shanker And Ors.
Judges:
30 May, 1933·1. The present application is made by one Mt. Ram Kali for the revision of an order passed by a First Class Magistrate of Bareilly in a case under Section 133, Criminal P.C. Briefly the facts are that Mt. Ram Kali had put up some turnstiles on a plot of land which admittedly is her property and thus...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Emperor vs R.N. Basu (For B. Parshottam Das ...
Judges:
29 May, 1933·1. This application is connected with Criminal Revision No. 107 of 1933 Vide AIR 1933 All 612 Ed. and has been made like that by Mr. R.N. Basu, Secretary of the District Bar Association, Allahabad, on behalf of the accused B. Parshottam Das Tandon, who was fined Rs. 200 under Section 32, Police Act,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
R.N. Basu (For B. Parshottam Das ... vs Emperor
Judges:
29 May, 1933·In future therefore failure on the part of the applicant to submit his application to the lower Court will operate as a bar to the application being entertained by the High Court. 2. If this rule of practice had been followed the present application would have been rejected on the ground that it had...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Emperor vs Gayan Singh And Ors.
Judges: Kendall
22 May, 1933·JUDGMENT Kendall, J. 1. This is a reference made by the District Magistrate of Cawnpore asking the court to set aside an order passed by a Sub-Divisional Officer of that District by which he discharged certain persons who had been brought before him under Section 109, Criminal Procedure Code. The ci...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Bafatan vs Emperor
Judges:
19 May, 1933·4. In exercise of these powers the Local Government has declared various areas in the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh to be Notified areas and by notifications dated 6th June 1917, and 11th June 1917, has extended to such areas generally the provisions of certain sections or portions of sections o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B. Madan Mohan vs B. Kanhaiya Lal
Judges:
02 May, 1933·1. This is an appeal against an order dated 25th July 1932, by which the Court below refused to set aside an ex parte decree. The facts of the case are that the suit was fixed for final hearing for 31st May 1932. On 23rd May 1932 the defendant's mother died and therefore the defendant on 25th May 19...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Manabendra Nath Roy vs Emperor
Judges:
02 May, 1933·16. The letter refers further to the advertisement of "India in Transition" the authorship of which the appellant admitted in the Sessions Court. This book was printed in 1922 in Geneva and reference shall be made to it later. Ex. 5 is a letter from the appellant to Dange. It is dated 2nd November a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Karim Bux vs Debi And Anr.
Judges:
02 May, 1933·1. This is an application in revision from the decision of the Judge, Small Cause Court, Bulandshahr. The plaintiff filed an action for damages for breach of contract under these circumstances. There was a decree against the plaintiff-judgment-debtor for Rupees. 100 odd. A small sum of Rs. 10 had be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Moti Lal vs Radhey Lal And Ors.
Judges:
02 May, 1933·Total Rs. 5,090-10-0. 2. The claim was resisted by the firm of Gobind Ram Brij Lal. The principal defence was that 887 bags of wheat had been sold by the contesting defendants in November 1924 and January 1925 under the orders of the firm of Mithu Lal Gopal Dass. The goods were sent to Calcutta unde...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Jaimala Kunwar And Anr. vs Collector Of Saharanpur And Ors.
Judges:
02 May, 1933·2. The defendants to the suit were besides Atma Ram, his brother Abheynandan Lal. We have already stated that Mt. Phulwanti was made a defendant. A fourth person, Abdul Majid Khan, was made a party as a transferee from Lala Atma Ram and Abheynandan. The Collector of Saharanpur, who was the plaintiff...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.