Ram Prasad vs Binaek Shukul
Judges:
31 March, 1933·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal and has arisen out of a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,070-3-6 made up of Rs. 595-13-9 principal and Rupees 474-7-6 interest together with another sum of 0-2-3 which need not be detailed, on the allegation that the defendant purchased on 25th June 1914 from the plaintiff ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Secy. Of State vs Ghanshyam Das Baij Nath
Judges:
31 March, 1933·1. This is a defendant's appeal and arises out of a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 1,309-6-0 on account of the shortage in weight of mustard oil despatched by the plaintiff from the Agra City station and for the recovery of a further sum of Rs. 85-13-0 that the plaintiff had to pay on account of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Secy. Of State vs Madhuri Das-Narain Das
Judges:
30 March, 1933·The consignment in question arrived at its destination, Naini, on 19th August 1931. The name of the consignee entered in the railway receipt was that of the firm Madhuri Das Narain Das, the plaintiff opposite-party. The railway receipt described the relative consignment as No. 23, which implied that...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Inoyia vs Harbans Prasad And Ors.
Judges:
30 March, 1933·2. Nevertheless for the reasons given towards the end of his order the Sessions Judge dismissed the application for revision. It has been argued in this Court that if the Sessions Judge held that the Magistrate had usurped the functions of a Sessions Judge and tried the case instead of merely making...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lachhman Das Babu Ram vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges:
29 March, 1933·1. This is a very short matter and is concluded by a decision of this Court in Radhey Lal Balmukand AIR 1931 A11 23. In an income-tax matter decided on 9th July 1929, this Court awarded to the assessee his costs against the opposite party. The costs would naturally include the amount of Rs. 100 depo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarjoo Ram Sahu vs Partap Narain And Ors.
Judges:
28 March, 1933·1. These are decree-holder 5 applications directed against an order of the Subordinate Judge of Basti, allowing ' the opposite parties rateable distribution. The applicant Sarju Ram Sahu had obtained a decree against his judgment-debtor in the Court of the Subordinate Judge. On 7th February 1930, he...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Alamgir Footwear And Co. vs Secy. Of State And Anr.
Judges:
27 March, 1933·1. This is a revision against the decision of the Judge, Small Cause Court, at Agra, by which the applicant's suit against the Secretary of State for India in Council and the Madras and Southern Mahratta Railway was dismissed with two sets of costs, one set to each of the defendants. The suit was di...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Emperor vs Shib Lal
Judges:
27 March, 1933·1. This is an appeal by the Local Government against the acquittal of one Shib Lal, who was convicted by a Magistrate of the First Class under Section 326, Penal Code, but was acquitted on appeal by the learned Sessions Judge. The facts of this case are practically undisputed. An extra amin named Ka...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ahmad Yar Khan vs Kheyali
Judges:
27 March, 1933·1. This is an application for the revision of a decree and order of the Judge of the Small Cause Court of Budaun, dismissing the plaintiff's suit. The plaintiff had obtained an ex parte decree on 26th April 1932 and on 11th May the defendant made an application to set aside the ex parte' decree, fil...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Puttu Singh And Ors. vs Vidya Ram And Ors.
Judges:
23 March, 1933·1. This application in revision must succeed. It appears that an ex parte decree was passed in favour of the applicants before us. Within a few days of the passing of the decree, the defendants made an application for the setting aside of the ex parte decree and for a re-hearing of the suit. Two poi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.