Udmi Ram-Ram Sarup vs Ghasi Ram-Sakhan Lal
Judges:
21 February, 1933·1. This is an application for the revision of an order of the Subordinate Judge of Kashipur. One of the issues raised by the pleadings was whether the Court at Kashipur had jurisdiction to try the suit and an application was made by the defendant that this issue should be tried first. The applicatio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagat Narain vs Nizamuddin And Ors.
Judges:
21 February, 1933·1. This is an application in revision by Jagat Narain who was appointed a shahna or watchman by a Commissioner. The Commissioner had been appointed by the Court to attach certain moveable properties belonging to the judgment-debtor which were in a shop. He was ordered to keep them in his custody til...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Swarup vs Joti And Anr.
Judges:
20 February, 1933·11. In Article 62(c) I think there is no real difficulty in applying the rule to two or more bonds as well as to one bond. Neither the learned Munsif nor the Chief Inspector of Stamps seem to have felt any such difficulty. They assumed that Article 62(c) was applicable, although 29 bonds were transf...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Bashiran vs B. Moti Ram
Judges:
20 February, 1933·1. This purports to' be a second appeal from an order passed, by the learned District Judge of Cawnpore in the exercise of his appellate: jurisdiction as Judge of the Court of Insolvency. It was passed on appeal, from an order -of the Subordinate Judge-of that district exercising the powers, of an I...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mangu Lal Ganga Charan vs Munni Lal
Judges:
17 February, 1933·2. So far as Sheo Narain, son of Chotey Lal, is concerned there is a clear finding of fact to the effect that he was never a partner of the firm of Ajodhia Prasad Sheo Narain, and it is impossible to say that this finding is vitiated by reason of any mistake of law. It was next argued that as the sa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rikhi Ram And Ors. vs Radhe Shiam
Judges:
14 February, 1933·ORDER Kendall, J. 1. This application is made on the ground that the learned Munsif had no jurisdiction to pass an order under Section 151, Civil P.C. which had the effect of enlarging a passage way in the house of the plaintiff-opposite-party. The facts found by the Munsif are that in a partition s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kushalpal Singh vs Gulzari Lal And Anr.
Judges:
14 February, 1933·3. On the pleadings, above referred to, a number of questions arose for decision. As to whether Bansidhar and Badri were the owners of the shops in suit as alleged by the plaintiff or Makkhan Lal and Mulchand were the owners thereof, both the Courts below have foun'd in favour of the defendants, tha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Makhan Lal And Anr. vs Sujan And Ors.
Judges:
13 February, 1933·from the evidence it appears that the respondent's enclosure is old and it is within that enclosure that the new constructions have been made. This being so there are no good reasons for demolishing the buildings, A cosharor is fully entitled to build within his compound and so long as he does not e...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Shahzadi Begam vs Alakh Nath And Ors.
Judges:
13 February, 1933·2. The period of limitation prescribed by Article 170, Schedule 1, Limitation Act, for the presentation of an application for leave to appeal as a pauper is 30 days and the application in this case was presented 88 days after the date of the decree appealed from. The question that I have to decide i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganga Prasad Sahu vs Sarda Mahesh Prasad Singh And Anr.
Judges:
11 February, 1933·1. This application is directed against an order of the Subordinate Judge of Mirzapur passed on a petition by the present applicant to be allowed to bring a suit in forma pauperis. The applicant sought permission to sue as a pauper the Raja of Barhar and one Bechanu Singh on the allegation that he h...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.