Madho Lal vs Lal Bahadur Singh
Judges:
18 August, 1933·No document stipulating ground rent or proof of the contract stipulating payment of ground rent in respect of the site of the house owned and possessed by this defendant has been mentioned in the plaint. Under the circumstances the frame of the suit is incorrect and the suit, as it stands, as agains...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Seth Ganga Sagar vs Unknown
Judges:
18 August, 1933·2. The assessee claims that two losses on shares and securities should be deducted from the sum which is taken as his income for the purpose of income tax. These losses are, firstly, Rs. 60,000, on account of loss incurred from the liquidation of the Tinnevelly Textiles Limited at Calcutta, and seco...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Seth Ganga Sagar vs Unknown
Judges:
18 August, 1933·The Income-tax Officer has found that the assessee does not carry on any business either in the purchase and sale of shares or in Government securities, and as such the investment of capital shares and in Government securities is purely an investment for the purpose of earning interest and dividends...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagdish Saran vs Jaidai Kunwar And Anr.
Judges:
18 August, 1933·2. It appears that there was an application for partition of zamindari property and it was opposed by the defendant on the ground that she was the owner of it and her name was recorded in the khewat. Thereupon, the applicant before us instituted the suit out of which this revision has arisen to obta...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mathura Das Channu Lal vs Emperor
Judges:
18 August, 1933·1. This is an application under Section 66(3) Income-tax Act, for an order of this Court directing the Income, tax Commissioner to state a case. The circumstances leading to the application are briefly these. The assessee was called upon by a notice under Section 22(2), Income-tax Act, to submit a r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bansidhar And Anr. vs Shiv Singh And Ors.
Judges:
17 August, 1933·4. It however happened that on the date of the mortgage dated 12th March 1921 the mortgagors were not competent to hypothecate village Nahil because there had been a money decree against this village put in execution, of which the execution had been transferred to the Collector under Schedule 3, Civ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sohan Lal And Ors. vs Atal Nath
Judges:
17 August, 1933·7. When the matter went up to their Lordships of the Privy Council their Lordships agreed with the learned Subordinate Judge in holding, that, although the language employed was perhaps not that of a trained draftsman, it clearly purported to transfer interest in the immovable properties (p. 369 of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. M.H. Faruqi vs Municipal Board
Judges: R Singh
16 August, 1933·2. Dr. Faruqi, the applicant, obtained a license for his motor from the Municipal Board, Allahabad. The period for which the license was obtained ended on March 30, 1930. After this date Dr. Faruqi did not apply for the renewal of his license. On November 2, 1931, about one year and nine months afte...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Noor Ahmad vs Irshad Ghaus
Judges:
16 August, 1933·1. This is a plaintiff's application for the revision of an order of the judge of the Small Cause Court of Piliibhit dismissing the suit on the ground that the promissory note on which it was originally based was not admissible in evidence because it had not been properly stamped. The trial Court ad...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M.H. Faruqi vs Municipal Board
Judges:
16 August, 1933·2. Dr. Faruqi, the applicant, obtained a license for his motor from the Municipal Board, Allahabad. The period for which the license was obtained ended on 30th March 1930. After this date Dr. Faruki did not apply for the renewal of his license. On 2nd November 1931, about one year and nine months af...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.