Kundan Lal vs Nathu
Judges:
03 April, 1933·2. The learned Judge found that there was no evidence before him to prove that Kundan Lal was not the real holder of the promissory note but his toaster was. Then the learned Judge proceeded to consider the effect of Nathu having been declared an insolvent and subsequently discharged but finding him...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Moti Ram vs Karim
Judges:
03 April, 1933·1. This is an application in revision against an order of the Judge Small Cause Court. It appears that before the decree was passed in the suit the decree-holder Moti Ram who is the applicant before me asked for the attachment of a debt said to have been due by the respondent Karim to the judgment-d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.