Beni Prasad vs Phula Mal Madan Mohan Lal And Ors.
Judges:
12 April, 1933·1. This is an appeal from an order passed in insolvency proceedings. The applicant, Beni Prasad, was adjudged insolvent on 29th November 1930. He was directed to apply for his discharge after the expiry of a year. He applied within that time for a protection order under Section 31, Provincial Insolv...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Town Area Mandha vs Mt. Manglo
Judges:
11 April, 1933·1. This is an appeal against an order remanding a suit for decision on the merits. It was passed under the following circumstances: The Town Area of Moudaha in the district of Hamipur found that one Munna had built a shop without permission of the Town Area Committee and prosecuted him and subsequen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sm. Sundar Devi vs Dattatraya Narhar Rege And Anr.
Judges:
11 April, 1933·4 After this the case was again taken up on 18th December 1928. The Court's order is: Mr. Asharfi Lal for the plaintiff wants time to inform the Court as to which date will suit the plaintiff, Mt. Sundar Devi, for her appearance at Jaunpur for further cross-examination. Fix 2-l-'29. 5 The case was t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Emperor vs Chaube Dinkar Rao And Ors.
Judges:
11 April, 1933·4. The case of Jagat Narain can be briefly dealt with. He admits that he went to the Judge and told him that the plaintiff would pay Rs. 10,000 if the suit were decreed, but denies that he went on behalf of the plaintiff. He makes out that he was really an emissary from the defendant and that his ob...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rahat Husain And Ors. vs Emperor
Judges:
11 April, 1933·Superintendent of Police: Basti, Ghulam Muhammad with men or Ghulam Husain looted my house and injured seriously my brother Ramkhelawan and others. Could not report: as police siding with them, Tulsiram. 3. learned Counsel has argued that this action of Tulsiram is unnatural, but we do not think it ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Secy. Of State And Anr. vs Firm Jhaddu Lal Hazari Lal
Judges:
11 April, 1933·1. These applications are by the East Indian Railway and the Bengal North-Western Railway and are directed against two decrees of the Small Cause Court, Aligarh, awarding the plaintiff Rs. 14-4-0 and Rupees 35 compensation, respectively, for damages by wet to two consignments of raw sugar while in t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Husain Baksh vs Mr. Briggen Shaw (W.J.)
Judges:
10 April, 1933·Reference reverse. 1. It is pointed out that my pay cannot be attached for debits and that traders allowing credit to serving soldiers, do so at their own risk. 2. It was pointed out to this man and he was told that if he wrote to the person that incurred the debt with him he would receive payment. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Secretary Of State vs Raghubar Dayal-Babu Ram
Judges:
10 April, 1933·As 191 bundles of the- above consignment agree with the specifications in your Beejak there is no justification for your declining to effect delivery of them. Will you please arrange to remove these 191 bundles at an early date and then submit your claim for the rejected 9 bundles which will be cons...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tripathi Bishambhar Nath Tewari ... vs Jag Prasad Rai And Ors.
Judges:
05 April, 1933·JUDGMENT Bennet, J. 1. This is a second appeal by the plaintiffs against the decree of the lower appellate Court refusing to grant interest to the plaintiffs, although the Court upheld a decree for a sum of Rs. 3,000 in favour of the plaintiffs as compensation. The plaintiffs sued under the followin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Chhoti vs Har Dayal Singh
Judges:
03 April, 1933·2. The appeal was thenceforward treated as preferred on a properly stamped memorandum of appeal. It was laid before a Bench of this Court under Order 41, Rule 11, Civil P.C. and was admitted on 31st March 1930. The translation and printing of the record were taken in hand and after the preparation o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.