L. Mansa vs Mt. Ancho And Ors.
Judges:
20 April, 1933·1. This is a plaintiff's application in revision from a decree of the Court of Small Causes. The plaintiff sued on the strength of two bonds which were ostensibly executed after an interval of 14 months. The plaintiff beside examining himself, produced one witness whose demeanour did not impress the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash And Ors. vs Mohammad Ishaq And Ors.
Judges:
19 April, 1933·Let the mortgaged property be sold first. The application under Order 38, Rule 5 is premature. 2. We. may note in passing that the order of the learned Subordinate Judge is extremely meagre. It does not expressly reject the mortgagee's application for attachment before judgment, though there is no d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Ghulam And Anr. vs Shyam Sarup And Ors.
Judges:
19 April, 1933·There wag also a point that one of the persons who originally raised the suit and got the sanction having died, the suit could not go on; but there does not seem any force in that point either, it being a suit which is not prosecuted by individuals for their own interest but as representatives of th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cantonment Board vs Kashi Ram
Judges:
19 April, 1933·1. This is an application for the revision of an order of a Magistrate of Agra acquitting the opposite party Kashi Ram of an alleged offence under Section 187 read with Section 268 of the Cantonment Act, 1924. The applicant had applied to the Cantonment Authority under Section 179 for permission to ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muhammad Khalilur Rahman Khan vs Mohammad Muzammilullah Khan
Judges:
13 April, 1933·that if some of the covenants of an indenture or of the conditions endorsed upon a bond are against law, and some good and lawful; that in this case the covenants or conditions which are against law are void ab initio and the others stand good. 4. Similarly, Gaskell v. King (1809) 11 East 165 and Sh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarabjit Pratap Bahadur Sahi vs Inderjit Pratap Bahadur Sahi
Judges:
13 April, 1933·1. Tins is a judgment-debtor's appeal against an order dismissing his objections to the execution of a decree taken out by the decree-holder against him. Raja Inderjit Pratap Bahadur Sahi obtained a decree for arrears of revenue against Kuar Sarabjit Pratap Bahadur Sahi from the Revenue Court. He ap...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mool Chand vs Ganga Sahai
Judges:
13 April, 1933·1. This is an application in revision from the decision of the learned Subordinate Judge of Aligarh. The plaintiff brought a suit for salary, and notice was served on the defendant. On 20th April the case was fixed for hearing further evidence. Neither the plaintiff nor the defendant appeared, and t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Harakh Narain Singh And Anr. vs Babban And Ors.
Judges:
12 April, 1933·1. The two Judges composing the Bench have arrived at different conclusions as regards the amount for which a decree should be passed in favour of the plaintiffs. The lower Court decreed the plaintiffs' claim in its entirety. One of us would decree it only to the extent of Rs. 2,275-4-0; while the o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dwarka Das vs Kishan Das
Judges:
12 April, 1933·7. But the learned advocate has argued that there is no exception to this general rule which was not pressed in these cases. He relies strongly on the case of Narayan v. Venkatacharya (1904) 28 Bom 408, and particularly on the observations of Chandavarkar, J., at. p. 411 that: the law as laid down i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Harbans Dube vs Sita Ram And Anr.
Judges:
12 April, 1933·1. This is an application for revision directed against a decree of the Judge of Small Cause Court at Jaunpur. The applicant was defendant 1 in the suit, and was alleged to have executed the promissory note and the receipt on foot whereof the suit was brought. He denied the execution of the promisso...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.