Mt. Anis Begam And Ors. vs Malik Muhammad Istafa Wali Khan
Judges:
25 April, 1933·6. A similar observation was made by the same learned Judge in Agha Ali Khan v. Altai Hasan Khan (1892) 14 All 429, (at p.448), I do not think that the learned Judge meant to lay down any inflexible rule which would have universal application. Presumably, what he meant was that ordinarily the opinio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Abdul Jalil Khan And Anr. vs Mohammad Abdul Salam Khan
Judges:
25 April, 1933·2. The plaintiff, in his plaint, stated that during the period of three years from 1st June 1925, to 31st May 1928, the plaint property had been in use and possession of the defendant, that properties Nos. 1 and 2 could be let at about Rs. 300 per mensem and that therefore he was entitled to recover...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Munna Lal vs Shiva Charan Lal
Judges:
25 April, 1933·1. This is an application for revision by the defendant in a suit which was dismissed by the lower Court for non-appearance of the plaintiff but subsequently restored on an application purporting to be one under Order 9, Civil P.C. It appears that the case was fixed for final disposal on 2nd March 1...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Adhar And Anr. vs Mt. Sudesra
Judges:
25 April, 1933·1. This is a reference to a Full Bench. The questions to be decided are: "(1) Does the word ''sister" in Section 2, Hindu Law of Inheritance (Amendment) Act, 2 of 1929, include a half sister? (2) If so, does it include both a half-sister by the same father and a half-sister by the same mother?" Thes...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mangat Rai And Ors. vs Duli Chand And Ors.
Judges:
25 April, 1933·4. We are satisfied that the respondents in this case having taken out of Court the money due to them on account of the property did not act honestly in prosecuting thereafter their appeal against the order setting aside the sale, and we are further satisfied that if the High Court, which decided th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Panna vs Ram Saran And Anr.
Judges:
21 April, 1933·2. There were apparently two windows to the north, one to the east and one to the south, that is, one facing the defendant's land. The defendant has built his house right up against the house of the plaintiff so that the whole of the light of the window facing south has been obliterated. The learned...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Purshottam Lal Jaitly vs W.T. Henley'S Telegraph Works, ...
Judges:
21 April, 1933·2. It appears that the plaintiff, W. T. Henley Teleghaph Works Ltd., sued for recovery of a certain sum of money and impleaded the Gorakhpur Electric Supply Co., Ltd., as defendant 1 and P. L. Jaitly and Co., as defendant 2. The suit was contested by both the defendants, who filed separate written s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Kanizum Hani vs Syed Mohammad And Ors.
Judges:
21 April, 1933·1. This is an application in revision against the order by the Court below dismissing an application of Mt. Kuniz Umi Hani praying for permission to sue as a pauper. One Mirza Abid Ali Beg made a wakf under a registered deed on 3rd November 1887. After the creation of the-wakf certain transfers were...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Janki Pershad vs B. Lekhraj And Ors.
Judges:
20 April, 1933·1. This is an application in revision by an auction-purchaser from an appellate order setting aside a sale under Order 21, Rule 89, C.P.C. The property was sold on 23rd June 1931, and an application under Order 21, Rule 89 was filed on 22nd July 1931. It contained the allegation that on that date he...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lala Ganeshi Lal And Ors. vs Anwar Khan Mahboob Co.
Judges: R Singh, N Ullah
20 April, 1933·5. The principal question for our consideration is whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the declaration claimed by them in these terms: The court may be pleased to declare that the plaintiffs have got the right to use the trade mark and design 'A' and that the defendants have no right to restrain ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.