In Re: Pallu Mall Bhola Nath vs Unknown
Judges:
28 April, 1933·3. On the assessment being made by the Income-tax Officer under Section 23(4), Income-tax Act, the assessee preferred an appeal to the Assistant Commissioner, who, after examination of the record, expressed the opinion that as the Income-tax Officer had made the assessment to the best of his judgmen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Emperor vs Sheo Dayal And Ors.
Judges:
28 April, 1933·5. In the evidence for the prosecution and in the reports there are three main events. The first is the assault on the house of Fakhruddin; the second is the assault on the house of Yasin; and the third is the assault on the house of Mahbub. In each of these three cases murders were committed. In th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Union Indian Sugar Mills ... vs Unknown
Judges:
28 April, 1933·1. The liquidator of the Union Indian Sugar Mills Co., Ltd. (in liquidation) has at his disposal a surplus after paying all the creditors of the company. It therefore became his duty to divide this pro rata among the share-holders. He naturally proposed to divide this money among, those share-holder...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Parmarath Gir vs Krishna Dayal Gir And Ors.
Judges:
28 April, 1933·1. This is an application for revision directed against an order of the learned Subordinate Judge of Benares, cancelling a previous order of his own by which he had dismissed the plaintiff's suit for his non-appearance in person. The applicant before us is one of the defendants in a mortgage suit br...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Krishna Chandra vs Mahabir Prasad And Ors.
Judges:
27 April, 1933·2. The plaintiff in this case was a minor suing through a guardian and his case was that in a previous suit brought for the partition of a joint Hindu family property he was not effectively represented by his guardian who was very negligent and careless and did not properly look after his case. The ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sahu Durga Saran vs Beni Pershad And Anr.
Judges:
27 April, 1933·1. This purports to be an appeal from an order under Section 47, Civil P.C. The appellant was appointed by the insolvency Court as a receiver of the estate of one Mt. Chaman Devi. Messrs. Bhagwan Das and Co., had a simple money decree against Mt. Chaman Devi. Certain zamindari property was attached ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rudra Dat Bhatt vs Emperor
Judges:
27 April, 1933·a carefully worked out scheme to get something like a 100 per cent profit from the Board "while the appellant was a member of it" and that: in one year the District Board paid Rs. 1,005, and for matting the price came to a little under Rs. 950. The price of the matting with freight as entered in the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Markandey Singh And Ors. vs Badan Singh And Ors.
Judges:
26 April, 1933·4. Discussing the meaning of the words "for the benefit of the estate," their Lordships of the Privy Council made the following observations in a case reported in Palaniappa Chetty v. Deivasikamony Pandarasannadhi A.I.R. 1917 P.C. 33 No indication is to be found in any one of them as to what is in t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sahu Shyam Lal vs M. Shayamlal
Judges: S Mukerji, King
26 April, 1933·3. The present suit was instituted by Munshi Shyam Lal principally against Sahu Shyam Lal for a declaration that the purchase made by him previously was good and that the property was vested in him and that the present purchase, by Sahu Shyam Lal was invalid and not binding upon him. Both the courts...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
(Sahu) Shyam Lal vs M. Shayamlal
Judges:
26 April, 1933·3. The present suit was instituted by Munshi Shyam Lal principally against Sahu Shyam Lal for a declaration that the purchase made by him previously was good and that the property was vested in him and that the present purchase by Sahu Shyam Lal was invalid and not binding upon him. Both the Courts ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.