Abdul Karim vs Kallan
Judges: Bajpai
10 November, 1932·1. On the allegation that certain disputes between the parties to the present litigation had been referred to arbitration without the intervention of a court and an award had been made thereon, the opposite party to the present application applied to the Munsif of Muttra, who had jurisdiction over t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ambika Prosad Upadhya vs M. Sada Sheo Lal
Judges:
09 November, 1932·1. This is an appeal by an unsuccessful plaintiff whose claim for joint possession along with the defendant-respondent over certain fixed rate tenancy plots and for the recovery of Rs. 270 as mesne profits has been dismissed by the lower appellate Court on the ground that the claim was barred by lim...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dilsukh Rai Baijnath And Anr. vs Dwarka Dass
Judges:
08 November, 1932·JUDGMENT Kendall, J. 1. This application has been made for the revision of an order of the Munsif of Hathras, permitting the plaintiff opposite party to amend his plaint. As originally filed, the plaint was one for a specified sum of money on the ground that as the result of three transactions betwe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Kishwar Jahan Begam vs Zafar Mohammad Khan
Judges:
08 November, 1932·Interest depends on contract, express or implied, or on some rule of law allowing it. Here there is no express contract for interest and none can be implied, and no circumstances less capable of justifying the allowance of interest as a matter of law can be imagined. 4. In Hamira Bibi v. Zubaida Bib...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghunath Das And Ors. vs Emperor
Judges:
08 November, 1932·1. This is a reference from the learned Sessions Judge, Allahabad, recommending that the charges framed against the three applicants, Raghunath Das, Bishwanath Prasad and Mt. Ram Devi be quashed. The charge was drawn as long ago as 10th May 1932, and is under Section 406, I.P.C, as against the first...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ratan Lal vs Mukandi Lal And Anr.
Judges:
04 November, 1932·2. In order to invite the application of this section to a given case it is necessary to prove that the fraud, mis-representation or gross neglect of the prior mortgagee was the proximate cause for the advance of money by the subsequent mortgagee. If the fraud, misrepresentation or gross neglect of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhawani Prasad And Ors. vs Secy. Of State And Anr.
Judges:
04 November, 1932·1. This is an appeal from an order passed by the President of the Tribunal under the U.P. Town Improvements Act, 1919, on 20th January 1931 rejecting an application for setting aside an ex parte decision. Some land was being acquired by the Town Improvement Trust of Allahabad and the Land Acquisitio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Zamin Ali And Anr. vs Mt. Azizunnissa And Ors.
Judges:
03 November, 1932·3. There is a great deal of difference between the original pleading that defendants 3 to 5 were not the sons of Mukhtar Ali and the amended pleading that they were his sons by a kept woman. It is particularly to be noted that defendants 1 and 2 are members of the family and they must have been very...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kashi Prasad vs Chhabi Lal And Ors.
Judges:
03 November, 1932·1. The only point that has been argued in this appeal is one of limitation and arises under the following circumstances. The predecessors-in-title of the plaintiffs made two usufructuary mortgages on 17th June 1907, one for the sum of Rs. 658 and the other for the sum of Rs. 115. They then on 3rd of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.