Kallan And Ors. vs Mohammad Nabi Khan And Ors.
Judges:
29 November, 1932·To me it appears that Ahmadi Begam finding that she had lost her claim to the house by being kept out of possession for over 12 years sold the house to plaintiff with a view that plaintiff might try his chance by a law suit. 3. The plaintiff appealed and the lower appellate Court has decreed the sui...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Rashid vs Sirajuddin And Ors.
Judges:
29 November, 1932·LAL MUHAMMAD | ______________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | Sabit Safdar Qadir Nadir Afzal Abdul Abdul Abdul Ali died Ali died Baksh died Ali died Ali died Latif died Wahid died Ghafur died 1881. 1882. 1887. 1893. 1898. April 1905. July 1905. 1918. 2. The ei...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Mohan Lal vs Tasadduq Husain And Ors.
Judges:
28 November, 1932·JUDGMENT Niamatullah, J. 1. This is a plaintiff's appeal and arises out of a suit for enforcement of a mortgage-deed dated 4th June 1917, executed by one Ali Bakhsh, who has since died and is now represented by his son, Sheikh Tasadduq Husain, and his two daughters, Mt. Piari and Rashidan, defendant...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ratan Brahai vs Mt. Kishen Dei
Judges:
25 November, 1932·2. Before we examine such authorities as may be on the point, let us consider the situation from the legal point of view. A raiyat holds either under a lease or under a license. If there is a lease and if the lease contains a term entitling the raiyat to build on any land that may be in his possessi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Baldeo Singh vs Ch. Hargyan Singh
Judges:
18 November, 1932·1. This is a pre-emption appeal and raises an interesting point of law. The facts briefly are as follaws: One Bholu sold his property to Baldeo Singh by a sale-deed, dated 1st October 1928. The plaintiff. Hargyan Singh, brought a suit to preempt this property on 4th September 1929. Prior to the inst...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Har Prasad And Anr. vs (Firm) Bhagwati Prasad Ram Sarup
Judges:
18 November, 1932·2. The facts of the case will have to be stated in some detail because the case has been argued at great length and very ably on both sides. The respondents who are a firm brought a suit against two persons named Har Prasad and Banwari Lal and described them as the owners of a certain firm. The suit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandramani vs Mathura Datt And Ors.
Judges:
18 November, 1932·1. This is a pre-emption appeal and the appellant is the pre-emptor. The appellant and the vendor are uterine brothers. The purchasers-are a third party, strangers to the family. The suit was resisted on two grounds, namely, the sale was effected with the consent of the plaintiff and secondly the pl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ahmadi Begam vs Munshi Ishaq Mohammad And Anr.
Judges:
18 November, 1932·2. It is true that the provisions of Order 21, Rule 89, are by way of indulgence to the judgment-debtor, and they should therefore be strictly complied with, and the question that we have got to decide is whether this sum coupled with the prior sum of Rs. 5,000 deposited at an earlier date is suffic...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
(Lala) Nand Kishore And Ors. vs Kunj Behari Lal And Ors.
Judges:
18 November, 1932·During the pendency of the execution of the decree, Lala Chheda Lal, the ancestor of the defendants and the father of the plaintiff, in consultation with each other went on taking objections, etc., with a view to delay the payment of the decree money. When the objections, etc., were disallowed, Lala...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muhammad Ishaq vs Om Parkash And Ors.
Judges: Mukerji, R Singh
17 November, 1932·JUDGMENT 1. This is an appeal against an order appointing a Receiver to the estate of the appellant. The history of the case briefly is as follows: The respondents obtained a decree for sale against the plaintiff and others in 1926, being decree No. 219 of 1925. The plaintiff-appellant has now insti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.