Bishambhar Nath vs Achal Singh
Judges:
23 May, 1932·1. A preliminary objection has been taken to the hearing of this application in revision. The order sought to be revised is an order of the District Magistrate of Agra purporting to have been passed by him in exercise of the appellate powers conferred on him by Section 318, Municipalities Act 2 of 1...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mangal Misir And Anr. vs Ramlagan Misir And Ors.
Judges:
20 May, 1932·3. The dispute in the suit giving rise to the. present appeal was with respect to two bamboo clumps and the value of the subject matter of the suit was Rs, 105. The plaintiffs' case was that the clumps were owned and possessed by them and were on their plot No. 105, whereas the contesting defendants...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hira Singh And Anr. vs Chandan Singh And Ors.
Judges:
06 May, 1932·JUDGMENT Bennet, J. 1. This is a reference by a learned Munsif under Section 267, Agra Tenancy Act. 3 of 1926, inquiring for a direction of this Court as to whether the Munsif has jurisdiction to entertain the suit in question. Learned Counsel for defendants drew attention to the fact that one of th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwan Sahai And Ors. vs Ram Chander And Ors.
Judges:
06 May, 1932·JUDGMENT Mukerji, J. 1. This is a reference by a learned Munsif under Section 267, Agra Tenancy Act, on the question of jurisdiction to entertain a certain suit. The plaintiff'3 case is as follows : An occupancy holding originally belonged to four brothers, one of whom, now represented by the defend...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yar Mahomed vs Bansi Singh And Ors.
Judges:
06 May, 1932·2. Relying on these observations Yar Muhammad made the application, to the Sessions Judge, which is now before me in appeal. Apparently there was some defect in the application as although he asked leave to proceed against eight persons, be instanced only the statement made by one of them Bansi Sing...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Narain-Das Mohan Lal Of ... vs Unknown
Judges:
05 May, 1932·1. These are two income-tax matters arising on the application of the asscssccs, Mohan Lal Narain Das of Benares. The first is a reference by the Income-tax Commissioner, Miscellaneous Case No. 842 of 1931, and the second is an application, Miscellaneous Case No. 70 of 1932, by the asscssccs asking ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Kaniz Fatma vs Yad Husain And Ors.
Judges:
05 May, 1932·4. It is admitted that the decision in Suit No. 4 of 1924 operates as res judicata, but it is contended for the plaintiff that the later decision in Suit No. 514 of 1924 also operates as res judicata between the parties. These two previous decisions are conflicting. In Suit No. 4 the sons of Niaz Hu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narain Das Mohan Lal, In Re. vs Unknown
Judges:
05 May, 1932·that is, the Commissioner is precluded from making a reference in connection with a proceeding under Chapter VIII and Section 52 comes in Chapter VIII. Learned Counsel argued that the assessee could require such a reference under Section 66(2). That sub-section states that "within 60 days of the dat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Babu Harnarain Sahi vs Sadhu Govind Rai
Judges:
03 May, 1932·2. The applicant states in para. 12 that he will suffer an irreparable injury and may have to pay substantial compensation if the villages of Sorha and Pakaryar are sold. This is explained by the allegation that he has entered into a deed of partition with his wife and son by which they become the o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sher Pal Singh vs Mt. Aijaz Fatima And Ors.
Judges:
02 May, 1932·2. This suit was instituted by Abdul Karim, on behalf of the representatives of the purchasers, for the rent of the years 1332 to 1334-F. One of the defence to the suit was that Abdul Karim Khan was not entitled to sue alone but was bound to join all the representatives of the original purchasers. T...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.