Mt. Kaulpati Kunwar And Anr. vs Ram Baran Singh And Ors.
Judges:
31 May, 1932·4. Again if defendants 4 to 6 be Wards of the Court, the agreement of 1921 is void as against them and cannot be enforced in a Court of law. We have to see whether in the circumstances of the case defendants 4 to 6 are wards of the Court within the meaning of Section 3, Sub-section (3), United Provi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kishan Chand And Anr. vs Lachhmi Chand And Ors.
Judges:
27 May, 1932·2. An application was later on filed on behalf of the defendant 2 for the setting aside of the ex parte decree passed against him. The Court after considering the case came to the conclusion that the decree should not be set aside and it rejected the application. This application was numbered as Mis...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sahu Deputy Shankar vs Mangal Sen And Anr.
Judges:
27 May, 1932·2. The trial Court took the view that the final decree for sale was reversed. or nullified result of the decree ad-judging Digambar Singh the true owner of the property in question. The lower appellate Court took the view that the applicants must have a remedy, as considerations of equity make it ri...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Matter Of And Advocate Of ... vs Unknown
Judges:
26 May, 1932·1. Complaint having been made by one Suraj Prasad Dube on 26th November 1929 against Mr. B., an advocate enrolled in this Court, this Court under the Bar Council Act, Section 10, referred the matter to the Bar Council for inquiry and report. In due course the Bar Council nominated a tribunal for the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shukrulla And Ors. vs Mt. Zuhra Bibi And Ors.
Judges: C F The, T Defendants, N Hingan, H A Sons, N Moharram, Dehu, Shukrullah, S M Alias, A Majid, D 10, I H Moharram, P 1 Hingan, H T Sons, A T Descendants, H C Flourished, O O Property, Sugar, R Mills, Collieries, C O Lending, Silver, Gold, O B Hingan, H D Lived, M Together, B L Funds, T P Business, N D 1921, W T Short, A T Plaintiffs, P 1 Defendants, T H Possession
26 May, 1932·The case for the defendants is that no doubt Hiagan and his three sons had a joint business but it was not a joint family business but of partnership within the meaning of Section 253, Contract Act and therefore the plaintiffs' remedy was in a suit for dissolution of the partnership and not for join...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarabdeo Bharthi vs Ram Bali And Anr.
Judges:
25 May, 1932·1. This is 'a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit brought by the plaintiff alleging himself to be the duly installed mahant, for possession of certain properties transferred by the former mahant. In the connected appeals we have held that the plaintiff has established his claim as the chela of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kali Charan Singh And Anr. vs Janak Deo Singh And Ors.
Judges:
25 May, 1932·1. This is an appeal by defendants 10 and 11 arising out of four pre-emption suits. The suits were consolidated, and that is why there is only one appeal. For purposes of convenience we shall adhere to the serial numbers of the parties in Suit No. 635 of 1926. Defendants 1, 2 and 3 entered into a co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tota Ram And Ors. vs Ram Lal And Ors.
Judges:
25 May, 1932·One Ram Chandra was the owner of a certain property. He mortgaged the same for a sum of Rs. 200 to one Paras Ram on 19th October 1915. The next year on 16th October 1916, he made a simple mortgage of the same property in favour of one Ram Lal and one Ganga Sahai, son of Tika Ram. The second mortgage...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Badri Prasad Misir vs Bijai Nand Tewari And Anr.
Judges:
25 May, 1932·1. This is a plaintiff s appeal arising out of a suit for pre-emption of a part of the property sold under a sale deed by the vendor in favour of the vendee. At the time of the sale the property transferred was not in the possession of the vendor, but was held by a third party against whom a suit ha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Shankar vs Secretary Of State And Anr.
Judges:
23 May, 1932·5. We now turn to consider the general question which is of much greater importance, namely, whether there is any liability of the Secretary of State for the acts of an Official Receiver. Under Section 56, Provincial Insolvency Act 5 of 1920, the Court may appoint any person as a receiver. There is ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.