Nawal Kishore vs Sarju And Anr.
Judges:
31 March, 1932·1. This is an appeal by the two defendants in the suit. The appeal although filed jointly, has been argued separately on behalf of the two appellants. The reasons will be apparent from the facts of the case which are as follows. The Raja of Basti owned the property in suit. It was eventually purchas...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Dhapo vs Bakridi
Judges:
31 March, 1932·1. Two points have been raised in this appeal. One is really a question of fact, and the other is a question of law. If we had to decide the question of fact, we, probably, would have been inclined to remit an issue, but that is not necessary in the view we take of the point of law. One Ramji Lal go...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B. Madan Mohan Lal vs Mt. Sheoraj Kunwar
Judges:
29 March, 1932·3. In the present case there can be no question whatever that the Magistrate had power to deal with the matter in question and with the persons in question, and he had therefore jurisdiction in the case. 4. This however does not conclude the matter. I note that in the case referred to me, the word "...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dambar Lal vs B. Chand Mal And Ors.
Judges:
29 March, 1932·JUDGMENT Bennet, J. 1. This is an execution first appeal by a judgment-debtor and the sole point raised is that the application for execution is beyond time. There was a final decree for sale in a suit on a mortgage, the decree being dated 26th October 1925. The present application for execution is ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Umrao Singh vs Kanwal And Ors.
Judges:
21 March, 1932·1. This appeal is connected with Execution Second Appeal No. 709 of 1930. The appeals have arisen in the following circumstances: Umrao Singh, the appellant before us in both cases, filed a suit for preemption against the respondent Kehri, He set forth in the plaint that the true consideration of th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dan Sahai vs Jai Ram Singh
Judges:
21 March, 1932·1. This appeal arises from a suit brought by a zamindar for possession of an agricultural plot occupied by a person who is described by him as a trespasser and who was "formerly his tenant. The suit was brought in the Court of the Munsif of Khurja, who acting under Section 271, Agra Tenancy Act (3 o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bikram Singh vs Dip Singh
Judges:
18 March, 1932·2. Bikram Singh appeals and the sole point urged is that having regard to the provisions of Section 264, Agra Tenancy Act, the suit in the civil Court is misconceived and that no suit lies. It has been argued that an order under Order 21, Rule 58, Civil P.C., passed by an Assistant Collector of the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Aziz Fatma vs Mukund Lal And Ors.
Judges: Pullan, N Ullah
18 March, 1932·1. The 'zamindari' shares of two brothers were put to sale in execution of a simple money decree and purchased by one Haji Muhammad Saleh Khan on the 20th of April 1925. At the time when that sale took place, another person, a mortgagee, had also brought a suit in respect of this property. The mortg...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Aziz Fatma vs Mukund Lal And Ors.
Judges:
18 March, 1932·1. The zamindari shares of two brothers were put to sale in execution of a simple money decree and purchased by one Haji Muhammad Saleh Khan on 20th April 1925. At the time when that sale took place, another person, a mortgagee, had also brought a suit in respect of this property. The mortgagee had ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pandit Chitar Singh vs Lala Lachmi Narain
Judges: Pollan, N Ullah
18 March, 1932·1. This is a judgment-debtor's appeal and arises in the following circumstances: 2. The respondent, Lachmi Narain, obtained a simple money-decree on the 18th May 1927 against the appellant Ohifcar Singh. Certain house property was attached in execution of the aforesaid decree, and was sold on the 29...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.