Emperor vs Mirza Mohammad Ibrahim
Judges: Kendall
07 June, 1932·2. When an application for bail on behalf of Mirza Mohammad Ibrahim was made before me the position was that Mirza Mohammad Ibrahim was being prosecuted for offences under Sections 302 and 307, Indian Penal Code. The actual enquiry had not started, but both the enquiring Magistrate and me Sessions J...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Charan Sahu vs Jumna Prasad Sahu
Judges:
07 June, 1932·1. This is a judgment-debtor's appeal purporting to be an appeal from an order passed in execution. The order in question is in the following words: In the sale proclamation the valuation be fixed at 50 times the land revenue. 2. This order was passed when there was a dispute as to the valuation to ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Kishan Lal And Ors. vs Bijai Singh And Ors.
Judges:
07 June, 1932·1. This is a defendants' appeal arising out of a suit brought by the land-holder for a declaration that the property in dispute, which is a grove land, was not liable to be sold in execution of a money decree against the landholder's grove-holder and for possession of the property. In substance the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mirza Mohammad Ibrahim vs Emperor
Judges:
07 June, 1932·1. This is an application on behalf of the Crown for the cancellation of an order passed by me on 7th December 1931, granting bail to one Mirza Mohammad Ibrahim. The arguments on the application have given rise to the legal question of whether when the High Court has passed an order under Section 49...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jauhari And Anr. vs Tunday
Judges:
07 June, 1932·9. The defendants who are holding possession with the consent of the mortgagee, Khem Singh, are entitled to plead that they are not rank trespassers, and can legitimately urge that the plaintiffs should have brought their suit for redemption against the mortgagee, Khem Singh, impleading the present ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Afzali Begam vs Lala Kanhaya Lal
Judges:
06 June, 1932·1. This is an application in a first appeal from a preliminary decree passed under Order 34, Rule 4, in a mortgage suit for sale. The memorandum of appeal was presented in this Court and was duly admitted, and the appeal was ordered to be put up for hearing under Order 41, Rule 11, either for dismis...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishna Murari Lal vs Dixit Chaturbhuj
Judges:
06 June, 1932·But apparently ho did not choose to spend two minutes and hoped the dog would got out unscathed from under the lorry. 2. It therefore held that the respondent driving the lorry was negligent in running down the appellant's dog. The first question argued was that there was contributory negligence on ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narsingh Narain vs Ram Chandra Pandey And Ors.
Judges:
06 June, 1932·Whether a person, who has purchased a share in a village, can maintain a suit for pre-emption against a stranger who has subsequently purchased another share, although 12 months from the date of the registration of the plaintifi'3 deed of purchase have not expired and he himself is still liable to b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Salona Bibi And Anr. vs Bu Ali Khan And Ors.
Judges:
02 June, 1932·2. The present suit has been brought by Mt. Salona Bibi, who claimed one-third share in the estate of Shabbir Ali, being one of his heirs under Shia law. She sought to set aside all the deeds of transfer made by Shabbir Ali Khan on the ground that he was a man of weak intellect and was under influen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Saghir Fatima Bibi And ... vs Brij Raj Singh And Anr.
Judges: Sulaiman, Banerji
01 June, 1932·JUDGMENT 1. This is a defendants' appeal arising cut of a suit for pre-emption. The sale-deed was taken by the two defendants jointly and there was no specification of any share in the document itself. One of them is supposed by the lower Appellate Court to be a co-sharer and the other is a stranger...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.