(Lala) Sri Ram vs L. Jai Kishun Lal And Ors.
Judges:
15 June, 1932·1. This is a judgment-debtor's appeal arising out of an execution proceeding. It appears that the appellant's father was the lambardar of a village, and he did not pay the full share of the profits to the respondents decree-holders. A suit was brought against his father and a decree was obtained aga...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bharsoa Shukul vs Musammat Manbasi Kuer And Anr.
Judges: Pullan, Niamatullah
14 June, 1932·it is the intention of the widow to keep the estate of the husband as an entire estate and that the property purchased would prima facie be intended to be an accretion to that estate. 2. Both these cases appear to us to favour the appellant's claim. That the property acquired by the widow was acquir...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bharosa Shukul vs Mt. Manbasi Kuer And Anr.
Judges:
14 June, 1932·it is the intention of the widow to keep the estate of the husband as an entire estate and that the property purchased would prima facie be intended to be an accretion to that estate. 2. Both these cases appear to us to favour the appellant's claim. That the property acquired by the widow was acquir...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanauji Lal vs Chiranji Lal And Ors.
Judges:
13 June, 1932·JUDGMENT Sulaiman, C.J. 1. This is an application in revision by the defendant from an order setting aside a dismissal for default of appearance in a suit for profits in the Revenue Court. The Assistant Collector rightly or wrongly came to the conclusion that there was sufficient cause for the non-a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anand Singh And Anr. vs Collector Of Bijnor And Ors.
Judges:
13 June, 1932·3. Accordingly the plaintiff assumed the liability to pay the decree which had been passed on 6th May 1925 against the Raja. Eventually payments were made on 7th May 1926and 18th October 1926 by the Court of Wards of a total amount of Rs. 57,664-12-0 and interest. The plaintiff now sues to recover t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Agyan Pandey vs Chatrughun Singh
Judges:
13 June, 1932·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit for recovery of possession of a holding. In the plaint the plaintiff frankly admitted that defendant 2 is one of several zamindars in the village and defendant 1 as a ryot of defendant 2 and that two defendants forcibly ejected the plaintiff from...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bahadur Lal vs Judges Of The High Court
Judges:
10 June, 1932·1. This is an application by an Advocate of this court for leave to appeal to His Majesty in Council from an order of suspension passed against him by a Full Bench on 26th May 1932. He has been suspended for a period of three months with effect from that date. It appears that this High Court has on ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Rafi And Anr. vs Kripa Ramji And Anr.
Judges:
10 June, 1932·JUDGMENT Sulaiman, C.J. 1. This is a plaintiffs' appeal arising out. of a suit for redemption of a mortgage, dated 12th July 1840. The plaintiffs are representatives of the original mortgagors and the defendants are the representatives of the original mortgagees. The existence of the mortgage is now...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Edna May Olivia Hardless vs Harold Richard Hardless
Judges:
10 June, 1932·ORDER Young, J. 1. This is a petition by the respondent alleging that on 24th December 1931 he wrote a letter to Capt. Carleton, Barrister who now appears for the petitioner, engaging him in the case and giving him confidential information which might prejudice the respondent if Capt. Carleton conti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Kumar And Ors. vs Lala Girdhari Lal And Anr.
Judges:
08 June, 1932·1. This is an application in revision of an order of the District Judge of Bareilly, who refused to entertain the applicant's application to file an appeal in forma pauperis. The order passed by the District Judge is as follows: I see no reason to allow this appeal. Appli1 cation rejected. 2. It is ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.