Nasarullah vs S. Wajid Ali And Anr.
Judges:
06 January, 1932·2. It is true that from time to time Nasrullah has denied that the property which he manages was a wakf within the meaning of the Act, but I cannot consider that this denial is of any value in view of his own action in complying with the requirements of the Act in the first instance. Moreover, once ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Bhagwanti vs Mt. Dhanwani And Ors.
Judges:
06 January, 1932·1. The taxing officer has reported a deficiency in the court-fee in this appeal of Rs. 333-8-0 corresponding to a similar deficiency in the plainfe in the suit and counsel for the appellant takes exception to this report. While he admits that under Section 5, Court-fees Act, the decision of the taxi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Ram Kunwar vs Amar Nath And Anr.
Judges:
05 January, 1932·1. This is a first appeal by the plaintiff Mt. Rain Kunwar whose suit has been dismissed by the Court of first instance. She claimed to be in adverse possession of certain zamindari property and asked for the relief of a declaration that she was the owner of that property and that it was not attacha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kripa Ram vs Kunwar Bahadur
Judges:
04 January, 1932·2. The claim was resistsd on merits, as well as on the ground of limitation and absence of cause of action. The trial Court, without going into the facts, dismissed the suit on the plea of limitation alone, holding that Article 49, Limitation Act, applied and the claim was more than three years afte...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahommad Salimullah Khan vs Khalilurrahman Khan
Judges:
02 January, 1932·ORDER King, J. 1. This is a reference under Section 5, Court-fees Act, 1870. The question is whether a court-fee is chargeable upon a memorandum of objections filed under Order 41, Rule 26, Civil P.C. There is no express provision in the Act making such a document liable to the payment of a court-fe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Salim Ullah Khan vs Khan Bahadur Maulvi ...
Judges: King
02 January, 1932·1. This is a reference under Section 5 of the Court Fees Act, 1870. 2. The question is whether a court-fee is chargeable upon a memorandum of objection filed under Order XLI, Rule 26, Civil Procedure Code. 3. There is no express provision in the Act making such a document liable to I he payment of a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Basant Lal Takhat Singh vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P.
Judges:
02 January, 1932·2. The purpose for which the money may have been borrowed would be immaterial. The whole question is whether any charge was created on the property on the income of which the tax has been assessed. 3. The question that has been formulated by the learned Commissioner is as follows: Whether the deposi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Basant Lal-Thakat Singh vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P.
Judges:
02 January, 1932·The question that has been formulated by the learned Commissioner is as follows :- "Whether the deposit with the creditors of title-deeds relating to property for the purpose of borrowing money for the purchase and extension of property constitutes a charge on the property within the meaning of s. 9...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.