Paras Ram Chaubey And Anr. vs Sheo Dhan Pandey And Ors.
Judges:
11 January, 1932·1. This is a defendant's appeal and arises out of a suit for redemption. Both the Courts below have decreed it but on payment of a much smaller amount than that claimed by the defendants-appellants who are the legal representatives of the original mortgagee Ramyad Ghaube. The plaintiffs are transfer...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Sahai vs Debi Din
Judges: Pullan, N Ullah
08 January, 1932·2. To advert to the facts of this particular case, the mortgage of 24th January, 1913, was in the form of a simple mortgage, the only remedy of the mortgagee being to obtain a simple money decree or a decree for sale of the mortgaged property. The mortgagee instituted a suit for enforcement of that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chaudhri Gulab Singh vs Raghubir Saran And Ors.
Judges:
08 January, 1932·1. This is an appeal by the decree-holder and is directed against an order of the learned Subordinate Judge of Moradabad, dated 9th May 1931, refusing to set aside an auction sale on the petition of the decree-holder under Order 21, Rule 90, Civil P.C. 2. Gulab Singh held a decree against Rup Basant...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Sahai vs Debi Din
Judges:
08 January, 1932·2. To advert to the facts of this particular case, the mortgage of 24th January 1913 was in the form of a simple mortgage, the only remedy of the mortgagee being to obtain a simple money decree or a decree for sale of the mortgaged property. The mortgagee instituted a suit for enforcement of that mo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chaube Bhan Dat vs Chube Moti Lal
Judges:
07 January, 1932·1. Chaube Moti Lal sued Chaube Bhan Dat to recover Rs. 80 on the ground that Chaube Bhan Dat had cut a nim tree belonging to the plaintiff which was growing upon the plaintiff's ground and had done so without the knowledge of the plaintiff and without any right and had taken it away. Those are ambig...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chaube Bhan Datt vs Chaube Moti Lal
Judges: Mears, Sen
07 January, 1932·1. Chaube Moti Lal sued Chaube Bhan Datt to recover Rs. 80 on the ground that Chaube Bhan Ditt had cut a him tree belonging to the plaintiff which was growing upon the plaintiff's ground and had done so without the knowledge of the plaintiff and without any right and had taken it way. Those are ambi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Basdeo Prasad vs Mt. Sakina Begum And Ors.
Judges:
07 January, 1932·JUDGMENT Pullan, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against, a decision of the Additional Subordinate Judge of Moradabad, who stated that the appeal before him was an appeal from a final decree in a suit for accounts. The plaintiff is said to be a brass merchant in Moradabad town who finding himse...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagdish Narain And Anr. vs Hazari Lal
Judges:
07 January, 1932·JUDGMENT Mears, C.J. 1. This is an appeal by two minor sons against the order of the learned Judge who refused to issue an injunction restraining the decree-holder from selling property mortgaged to him by their father. We do not propose to interfere with the decision of the learned Judge in this ma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
(Syed) Afzal Husain vs Mirza Mohammad Ahsan And Anr.
Judges:
06 January, 1932·JUDGMENT Pullan, J. 1. Many points raised in this application have already been discussed by us in our judgment in Nasarullah v. Wajid Ali A.I.R. 1932 All. 362. There are however two facts in particular which differentiate this case from the one decided by that judgment. In both the cases the Distri...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Puttoo Lal And Ors. vs Munshi Lal And Ors.
Judges:
06 January, 1932·JUDGMENT Mears, C.J. 1. Munshi Lal and others had executed a mortgage bond in favour of Behari Lal, Puttoo Lal and four others on 20th January 1914. The bond provided that the debt was to be paid after seven years. On 25th May 1925, the mortgagees brought a suit for recovery of Rs. 9,359-8 0 in enfo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.