S. Rashid Ahmad vs Mt. Anis Fatima And Ors.
Judges:
29 April, 1932·1. On an oral application made by Dr. Faruqi notice was issued to the appellant to show cause why Rs. 440 out of Rs. 4,000 lying in deposit as security in this Court should not be paid over to Dr. Faruqi towards the payments of fees due to him. It appears that Dr. Faruqi along with another counsel f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yakub Ali vs Tajammul Husain Khan And Anr.
Judges:
28 April, 1932·1. This is a plaintiff's application in revision against the order of the learned Small Cause Court Judge of Farrukhabad directing the plaint to be returned to the plaintiff for presentation in the revenue Court. The suit out of which this application arises was brought by the plaintiff for recovery...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Secy. Of State vs Kesho Prasad Sheo Prasad ...
Judges:
28 April, 1932·2. The defendant contested the suit inter alia on the ground that the loss did not arise from any misconduct on the part of the railway administration and that the loss was due to the fact that the bags in which the sugar was consigned were insecure, and that the railway administration was protected...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Murlidhar And Anr. vs Jainti Prasad And Ors.
Judges:
25 April, 1932·1. This is an application in revision by the defendants arising out of a suit under Section 9, Specific Relief Act. The defendants in execution of their mortgage decree purchased a house at auction and applied for delivery of possession. On 23rd February 1930 the Amin delivered possession to the def...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kalu Ram vs Babu Lal And Ors.
Judges:
22 April, 1932·3. The plaintiffs valued the first relief at Rs. 5,000 and paid Rs. 10 as court-fee thereon and valued the second relief at Rs.- 6,276-3-9 and paid another Rs. 10 on it. A difference arose between the Registrar, who is the taxing officer of this Court, and the appellant's counsel, and the former ref...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Asghar And Ors. vs Mt. Abida Begum And Ors.
Judges:
22 April, 1932·JUDGMENT 1. This is an application for leave to appeal to His Majesty in Council from a judgment of this Court passed in a first appeal from order, reversing the judgment of the lower appellate. Court and restoring that of the Court of first instance. The suit related to the partition of house prope...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Jai Dayal Madan Gopal Of ... vs Unknown
Judges:
22 April, 1932·4. If the question had turned entirely on an interpretation of the instrument of the partnership, I would have said that it means that there is one partnership firm in the name of Seth Jai Dayal Madan Gopal carrying on business at Kashi (Benares) and other places in which the two persons are partner...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sukhnandan Singh vs Mt. Ramdeyi Kunwar And Ors.
Judges:
22 April, 1932·1. The appellant is a decree-holder who obtained a final decree in a mortgage suit on 5th March 1926. He applied for execution of the decree on 21st March 1929 and his application has been dismissed as being barred by time. In appeal the decree-holder asks us to consider that his application should ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Sohni vs Raj Kumar Singh Jain And Ors.
Judges:
22 April, 1932·2. The finding of the lower Court that the houses in question are dwelling houses of the defendant's family has not been challenged before us. It has been held in Sultan Begam v. Debt Prasad [1908] 30 All. 324, that Section 4, Partition Act, is not limited to joint Hindu families but applies where t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
(Kunwar) Abdul Jalil Khan And Anr. vs (Kunwar) Mohammad Abdul Salam ...
Judges:
21 April, 1932·2. The learned Judges held that in the case before them interest was not recoverable on either ground. A similar view had already been expressed by another Bench of this Court in the case of Lalman v. Ghinta Mani [1919] 41 All. 254. It must be noticed however that in both these eases reference is ma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.