Kishen Chand Singh vs Mukan Sarup And Ors.
Judges:
29 July, 1930·1. This is an appeal from an order dated 5th February 1930 of the Court below cancelling a previous order dated 19th January 1929, under which an issue was remitted to the revenue Court under Section 273, Agra Tenancy Act. It is quite clear that at that time the Court must have been of opinion that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Matllob Hasan And Ors. vs Mt. Kalawati And Ors.
Judges:
29 July, 1930·2. In the case of Ram Charitra v. Mohan Dei A.I.R. 1923 All. 210 Ryves, J., expressed the view that the revenue Court was wrong in completing the partition without awaiting the final decision of the civil Court. He hold that the revenue authorities: were clearly wrong, and that they did not act in c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Makund Ram vs Mt. Ruqaiya Khatun And Anr.
Judges:
28 July, 1930·2. Makund Ram appealed against the decree, claiming his relief as follows: That the Hon'ble Court will be pleased to modify the decree of the Court below by granting a declaration that the plaintiffs are not entitled to get the right of Makund Ram sold, or grant such other and further relief as it m...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muhammad Yunis Khan vs Muhammad Saleh Khan
Judges:
25 July, 1930·3. With regard to the question of the performance of the demands, there is one point in favour of the plaintiff and that is that before even the deed of exchange was executed when he heard of the intention to exchange he had sent notice by means of a registered post-card, dated 6th September 1922 to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Moti Lal Nehru And Anr. vs Emperor
Judges:
18 July, 1930·2. The grounds of application are not clearly drafted, and there is no indication as to which of them apply to Section 17 (1) or to Section 117. A reference to the record however shows that Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10 and 11 relate to Section 17, whilst Nos. 7 and 8 apply to Section 117. 3. The learned G...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammed Yusuf And Ors. vs Abdul Majid
Judges:
16 July, 1930·3. Abdul Majid and the two other persons bound over along with him appealed to the Sessions Judge, and at the same time Abdul Majid applied to him in revision praying that the order discharging Mohammad Yusuf and his party under Section 107 should be set aside, and that further inquiry should be mad...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sat Parkash And Anr. vs Bahal Rai And Anr.
Judges:
16 July, 1930·a decree is preliminary when further proceedings have to be taken before the suit can be completely disposed of. 5. Mr. Panna Lal urges that the preliminary decree in a suit for sale necessarily becomes inconclusive when an appeal is filed against that decree. It is difficult to accept that contenti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Collector Of Etah vs Kishori Lal And Anr.
Judges:
14 July, 1930·5. The learned Judges before whom the appeal came for hearing were of opinion that there was a certain amount of conflict of rulings in this Court and felt that the case should go before a larger Bench. Hence this reference. 6. Point 1-As already pointed out there was a verbal omission in framing po...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kashi Nath And Anr. vs Official Receiver
Judges:
10 July, 1930·Rupees 50 were paid in cash to Jittu Sahu; Rs. 983, which was due to the mortgagee and was the subject of suit No. 2477 of 1927, in the Court of Small Causes at Benares; Rs. 734 left with the mortgagee for payment to two creditors of Jittu, namely, Munni Lal Rupees 425-4-0 and Jai Narain and Sheo Na...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Panna Lal vs Bhola Nath And Ors.
Judges:
10 July, 1930·2. Har Sahai obtained a decree for sale or foot of a mortgage in respect of several houses, and a shop including house No. 559 against the applicant Panna Lal and three others. Two of the houses, including No. 559 and the shop, were sold by auction and fetched sufficient price to satisfy the decree....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.