Kali Deen Singh vs Jagdat Pathak
Judges:
09 January, 1930·2. The first point taken before us is that the learned Judge of this Court has upset a finding of fact. 3. It appears that the respondent Jagdat Pathak brought a suit against the appellant Kali Deen Singh for his ejectment in the revenue Court alleging that Kali Dean was his tenant. The appellant Ka...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Basanti Bibi vs Babulal Poddar And Anr.
Judges:
09 January, 1930·----------------------------------------------------------------------- That it may be declared that the plaintiff is the sole owner of 11/4 annas share which belonged to Lal Ram Narain (her father) out of the five annas share of the firm Radha Kishan-Sita Ram and that defendant 9 (one Seth Chiranni...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Phal Singh And Ors. vs Bachchu Ram And Anr.
Judges:
09 January, 1930·2. The defence, to which the defendants eventually settled down, was a denial of the plaintiffs' possession, or enjoyment of any kind, of the land in dispute. 3. No documentary evidence was produced by either of the parties. The witnesses examined by the parties supported the case of continued posse...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gudri Singh And Anr. vs Jangi Singh
Judges: Dalal
09 January, 1930·1. The judgments of the two subordinate Courts are very vague and they have not considered the question of the proprietary title of the plaintiff after fully understanding the law as to the presumption to be drawn under Section 108 of the Evidence Act. The latter will have to be referred again to th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Banshidhar And Ors. vs B. Suraj Prasad Singh
Judges:
09 January, 1930·1. The main point which arises in this application is whether only one set or two sets of costs can be allowed under the rules on account of the legal practitioners' fees. So far as this Court is Concerned it is quite clear that the appeal which was originally filed was distinct and set apart from t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiam Sundar Singh And Anr. vs Jagannath Singh And Ors.
Judges: Mukerji, Bennet
08 January, 1930·2. The facts briefly are as follows. One Dirg Bijai Singh had four sons, Lal Bahadur Singh, Jagannath Singh, Ran Bahadur Singh and Jang Bahadur Singh. Lal Bahadur Singh's son is Sham Sundar Singh, defendant No. 1, and Sham Sandar Singh's son is Nagendra Bahadur Singh, defendant No. 2. The other defe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sham Sunder Singh And Anr. vs Jagannath Singh And Ors.
Judges:
08 January, 1930·2. The facts briefly are as follows: One Dirg Bijai Singh had four sons, Lal Bahadur Singh, Jagannath Singh, Ran Bahadur Singh and Jang Bahadur Singh. Lal Bahadur Singh's son is Sham Sundar Singh, defendant i, and Sham Sundar Singh's son is Nagendra Bahadur Singh, defendant 2. The other defendants a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Ahad vs Chhabi Ram
Judges:
08 January, 1930·Moizuddin Munni Begam | | | | | Abdus Samad Abdul Tafwizannisa Tahmidannisa | Ahad =Ghafur =Rafat | | Ahmad Ahmad Daughter | | Abdul Wahid | | | Abdul Fatma Wahid. Begam 3. Munni Begam had a son Abdul Ahad and two daughters Tafwizannisa and Tahmidan Nisa. Abdul Ahad was married to Mt. Fatma Begam. A...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Data Din vs Mt. Nohra
Judges:
07 January, 1930·Baijnath ________|_________ | | Ram Autar Suraj Bali | | | | Data Din Sat Narain | plaintiff 2 plaintiff 1 Ram Sanmukh =Mt. Nohra (defendant) 2. Data Din and Sat Narain claimed to be the members of a joint Hindu family with Ram Sanmukh, husband of Mt. Nohra defendant. They alleged that Ram Sanmukh d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
L. Ram Ratan Lal vs Mt. Gaura And Ors.
Judges:
06 January, 1930·2. Mt. Gaura was the cosharer of this mahal at the time of the auction sale. All the other cosharers who are defendants in the present action including Mt. Gaura, were in arrears of Government revenue to the extent of Rs. 378-3. The factum of the cosharers being in arrears to the above extent was no...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.