Goswami Sadanand vs Goswami Indra Nand And Ors.
Judges:
16 January, 1930·5. Appeal No. 88 of 1926 is the appeal of defendant 1 and the appeal No. 67 of 1926 in the appeal by the plaintiffs. 6. We shall take up the appeal of defendant 1 first. It was argued on behalf of defendant 1 that the parties being governed (admittedly) by the Dayabhaga school of the Hindu law, it w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Peare Lal-Kishan Prasad vs Diwan Singh-Ganeshi Lal
Judges:
13 January, 1930·Rule 16: The last due date for khatti is Phagun Sudi 5. The purchaser can have his goods weighed whenever he likes till that date. If the buyer does not get them weighed by the last date and does not make the payment on that date, the seller will be entitled to the pit and recover his losses from hi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pearey Lal Krishen Prasad vs Dev Karan Das Ram Saran Das And Ors.
Judges:
13 January, 1930·1. This case is in many respects analagous to Pearey Lal Kishen Prasad v. Diwan Singh A.I.R. 1930 All. 661. Most of the points raised in the two appeals are identical and do not call for any separate treatment. Defendant 1 had contracted to sell 1,00 maunds of wheat to the plaintiff. Four hundred ma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B. Dallu Singh And Anr. vs B. Chhakan Singh And Anr.
Judges: S M Sulaiman, Kendall
13 January, 1930·5. Subsequently, there was another sale-deed dated 18th September, 1926, under which another share was transferred to the vendees for Rs. 800 in mahal Katwaru. A suit for pre-emption was instituted by the present plaintiffs to claim this share also. Second Appeal No. 1794 arises out of this third su...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Firm Peare Lal Kishan Prasad ... vs Firm Diwan Singh-Ganeshi Lal ...
Judges: Sen, Niamatullah
13 January, 1930·5 per cent, barley etc. 6. In case there be more than 5 per cent, of barley etc. then half of it will be considered asidust, and half as wheat. A pitcontaining up to 12 percent, of other kinds of grain, i.e. upto 5 per cent of barley and 2. per cent, of dust 5 percent of other material will also hav...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Firm Pearey Lal Kishen Prasad ... vs Firm Dev Karan Das Ram Saran Das ...
Judges: Sen, Niamatullah
13 January, 1930·1. This case is in many respects analogous to Second Appeal No. 1493 of 1926. See 125 Ind. Cas. 453-[Ed.], Most of the points raised in the two appeals are identical and do not call for any separate treatment. Defendant No. 1 had contracted to sell 1200 maunds of wheat to the plaintiff. Four hundred...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B. Dallu Singh And Anr. vs B. Chhakan Singh And Anr.
Judges:
13 January, 1930·5. Subsequently, there was another sale deed, dated 18th September, 1926, under which another share was transferred to the vendees for Rs. 800 in mahal Katwaru. A suit for pre-emption was instituted by the present plaintiffs to claim this share also. Second appeal No. 1794 arises out of this third s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Kaniz Sughra Bibi vs Mt. Fidai Begam And Anr.
Judges:
11 January, 1930·1. This is an appeal against an order of remand passed by the learned District Judge. The facts very briefly are as follows: The appellant Kaniz Sughra brought a suit for partition of certain joint property against the plaintiff-respondents, who are two minors, and against others. That suit has culm...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Moti Bala Debi vs Satyanand Tirtha Swami
Judges:
11 January, 1930·1. This is an appeal from the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge of Benares in a suit brought by the plaintiff-appellant for enforcement of a mortgage deed dated 8th January 1921, executed by one Kalkanand Swami who was the Mahant of a shrine situate in Benares. A preliminary d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gaya Prasad vs Jaswant Rai And Ors.
Judges: S M Sulaiman, Kendall
11 January, 1930·3. The main point to consider is whether the defendants have acquired an indefeasible right by virtue of these gifts within the meaning of Section 20 of the Agra Pre-emption Act. 4. It is an admitted fact that the donor Ram Nath has a brother Bidhata and a minor son alive. They all live in one and t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.