Rajkumar vs Mangad Rai And Ors.
Judges:
09 April, 1930·2. The ostensible plaintiff to the suit was a minor Rajkumar on whose behalf the appeal is. His father Lachhman Das executed two mortgages in respect of the other defendants and on these mortgages decrees have been obtained by the mortgagees and the property has been advertised for sale. The plainti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahadeo Prasad Singh And Ors. vs Mathura Chaudhari
Judges:
08 April, 1930·4. In para. 3 it was provided that if they were for any reason unable to obtain proprietary possession of the shares in the three villages within a year after the death of the lady, or in spite of obtaining proprietary possession they did not execute a sale deed relating to those properties and deli...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghukul Tilak vs Pitam Singh And Ors.
Judges:
08 April, 1930·3. The learned Subordinate Judge held that the matter was not res judicata, but he further held that the plaintiff was not entitled to make the application under Order 34, Rule 6, Civil P.C. The points that we have to determine in appeal are the very two points that were before the learned Subordina...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
(Chaudhri) Pahunchi Lal vs Bhup Singh And Ors.
Judges:
08 April, 1930·2. It appears that the judgment was delivered by Ashworth, J., on 12th March 1929. No application to obtain a certificate to the effect that the case was a "fit one for appeal" was made before the learned Judge. An application was later on made before the learned Chief Justice of the Court in pursua...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Shakur Khan vs Mt. Rafiqunnissa And Ors.
Judges:
04 April, 1930·3. The plaintiff has now brought the present suit in his capacity of mortgagee of mortgagee rights under the mortgage of 4th April 1915. The learned single Judge of this Court has held that the present suit of the plaintiff is barred by the rule of res judicata, because in his former suit the plaint...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Deo Ram vs Mr. Frank Coombs And Ors.
Judges:
04 April, 1930·1. This is a Letters Patent appeal by the plaintiff Earn Dao Ram against a judgment of a learned single Judge of this Court dismissing his appeal. The circumstances are that Zalim Singh obtained a final mortgage decree on 6th March 1914 and to that mortgage decree Mr. Coombs was a party as being a s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
S.F. Rich vs Emperor
Judges:
02 April, 1930·2. The learned Judge has held that the Meerut Court had jurisdiction both under Section 179 and Section 181(2), Criminal P.C. 8. 179 runs as follows: When a parson is accused of a commission of any offence by reason of anything which has been done and of any consequence which has ensued, such offenc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nanku Singh And Ors. vs Parmatmanand Singh And Ors.
Judges:
02 April, 1930·1. This is a first appeal by the defendants against a final decree for sale prepared under Order 34, Rule 5. The argument on appeal is that the provisions of Order 34, Rule 4 are not applicable to a mortgage decree based upon a compromise and the Court below has therefore erred in law in directing t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
S.F. Rich vs Emperor Through Rashid Ahmad
Judges: B J Dalal
02 April, 1930·1. One Mr. Rashid Ahmad filed a complaint in the Court of a Magistrate of the District of Meerut against Mr. Rich, Manager of the French Motor Oar Company, Delhi, for an offence under Section 408 of the Indian Penal Code. On behalf ©f the defendant the question of jurisdiction was raised and both th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.