Sri Nath And Ors. vs Jagannath And Ors.
Judges:
18 November, 1929·9. As regards the finding relating to bona fide enquiries having been made by the defendants we find that finding also is unsatisfactory. We have already remarked that there was no such express plea in the written statement that there was no express issue on the point and that no question was put to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Union Indian Sugar Mills Co. ... vs Unknown
Judges:
18 November, 1929·6. It is significant that the applicants did not ask for any refund of the money (10 lakhs 62 thousand) they had handed over to the liquidators. On this application being made to the learned Company Judge, he directed that the withdrawal of the offer be recorded, The learned Judge left it open to th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jaggu Mal vs Brij Lal And Anr.
Judges:
15 November, 1929·JUDGMENT 1. This a Letters Patent Appeal against the decree of a learned Judge of this Court refusing the appeal of one Jaggu Mal who was plaintiff in one suit and defendant in the other. These suits related chiefly to parnalas and an application was jointly made by the parties to the Munsif asking ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mul Chand And Anr. vs Official Receiver And Ors.
Judges:
15 November, 1929·5. A consideration of the principles on which the law has been framed will enable us to arrive at proper conclusions having regard to the facts of a particular case. As pointed out by the Court of appeal in the judgment of Vaughun Williams, L.J., In re, Gaskell [1904] 2 K.B. 478(to which two other l...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Brijraj Saran Sing vs Sisram
Judges:
15 November, 1929·JUDGMENT Dalal, J. 1. Mr. Malik on behalf of the respondent Sisram tenant judgment-debtor has objected that no second appeal lies to this Court. The decree-holder desired to execute his decree for arrears of rent by ejectment of Sisram. Sisram objected that the decree-holder's property had at presen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Partap Pandey vs Lalu Pandey And Ors.
Judges:
14 November, 1929·3. Bindeshri was defendant 32 in that case. It does not clearly appear whether Bhagwant was a party at all. He does not, at any rate, appear to have filed a written statement. We must, therefore, take it that the question of priority was raised by Bindeshri alone. The Court framed issue 8 with refer...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Saheb Dayal Singh vs Mahabir Singh And Ors.
Judges: Niamatullah, Bennet
14 November, 1929·JUDGMENT 1. These are two second appeals, which have been disposed of in a single judgment of the lower Appellate Court. We will first deal with second appeal No. 1727 brought by Saheb Dayal Singh against Mahabir Singh and Ram Dhari Singh. This was a suit for specific performance brought by Saheb Da...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gobardhan vs Raghubir Singh
Judges:
14 November, 1929·3. The learned advocate for the appellant in appeal No. 559 of 1927 has contended that the sale deed of 10th July 1917 and the agreement of 11th July 1917 should be read together and considered to evidence a transaction amounting to a mortgage. The lower appellate Court has held that the requisite c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Abdullah Khan vs Ford And Macdonald Co. Ltd.
Judges:
14 November, 1929·2. The pay was for November and December 1922 and for ten days in January 1923. The plaintiff left the employment of the defendant or was dismissed on 11th January 1923. On 9th January 1926 the suit was filed. Both the trial Court and the lower appellate Court have found that the claims on both head...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
(Saheb) Dayal Singh vs Mahabir Singh And Ors.
Judges:
14 November, 1929·JUDGMENT 1. These are two second appeals, which have been disposed of in a single judgment of the lower appellate Court. We will first deal with second appeal No. 1727 brought by Saheb Dayal Singh against Mahabir Singh and Ram Dhari Singh. This was a suit for specific performance brought by Saheb Da...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.