Mohammad Sher Khan vs Amjad Husain And Ors.
Judges:
19 March, 1929·that the suit is not barred by time and adverse possession and as the appellants are owners of the site on which the house in dispute stands they are entitled to take back their land and of course the respondent is entitled to take materials of the house and he requires time for doing so and, theref...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ejaz Ahmad And Ors. vs Saghir Bano And Ors.
Judges:
18 March, 1929·1. The four appellants were defendants in a suit for partition. The property in which the plaintiffs claim a share belonged to one Hafiz Niaz Ahmad. He left behind several heirs and the plaintiffs claim specified shares against the other heirs of Niaz Ahmad. The defence of the appellants and the oth...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gomti Singh vs Anari Kuar And Ors.
Judges:
18 March, 1929·(2) Basdeo Singh gave his property to his two wives who along with Basdeo Singh were to be the owners in possession of the property and would remain so. (3) Basdeo Singh would get the names of his wives entered in the revenue papers along with his own name and if he failed to do so his wives would h...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Secy. Of State vs Har Charan Das And Anr.
Judges:
16 March, 1929·and under Section 3(1) of the same Act a compulsory deposit shall not in any way be capable of being assigned or charged and shall not be liable to attachment under any decree or, order of any civil, revenue or criminal Court in respect of any debt or liability incurred by the subscriber or deposito...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Empire Engineering Co. Branch ... vs The Municipal Board Bareilly
Judges: G Mears, Mukerji
16 March, 1929·1. Did the plaintiff agree to sell to the defendant a lorry of a particular description?. If so, what were the particulars of the lorry agreed to be sold? 2. Did the lorry supplied answer to the description of the one agreed to be supplied? 3 If the lorry supplied did not answer to the description a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jadunandan Singh vs Bechan Koeri And Ors.
Judges:
16 March, 1929·JUDGMENT Ashworth, J. 1. This second appeal arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff-respondents against the defendant-appellant. The plaintiffs are admittedly tenants of a holding and the defendant, the zamindar. The defendant wanted to get the boundary of the holding defined, and applied appa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chhotey Lal vs Manzur Ahmad And Anr.
Judges:
16 March, 1929·1. This second appeal arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff-respondent as zamindar against the defendant-appellant as a tenant for possession of a certain site in the town of Moudeha on the ground that the appellant who had originally been allowed occupation of the site for his house as an a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Empire Engineering Co. Branch Of ... vs Municipal Board
Judges:
16 March, 1929·4. It will be noticed that on the pleadings as described above, the issues that arose in the case were the following: 1. Did the plaintiff agree to sell to the defendant a lorry of a particular description? If so, what were the particulars of the lorry agreed to be sold? 2. Did the lorry supplied an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sadho Kandu vs Mt. Jhinka Kuer And Anr.
Judges:
15 March, 1929·1. This second appeal arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for arrears of maintenance fixed by a panchayat at Rs. 8 a month. It appears that the plaintiff, who is sister-in-law of the defendant, claimed from him Rs. 10 a month as maintenance, and t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sahu Lal Chand vs L. Ram Chandra And Ors.
Judges:
15 March, 1929·1. This is an appeal by Lal Chand arising out of a suit for pre-emption under very peculiar circumstances. On 18th August 1922, a sale deed was executed by Himmat in favour of Raushan Lal for Rs. 1,400. Suit No. 159 of 1923, was instituted for pre-emption of the property sold by Ram Chandar and Tej ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.