Har Chand And Anr. vs Dewan Singh And Ors.
Judges:
22 March, 1929·JUDGMENT 1. The learned advocate for the appellants has submitted that the documentary evidence in the case was not admissible in evidence and therefore the finding arrived at on the oral evidence was influenced by inadmissible documents. He claimed that the finding arrived at by the lower appellate...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muhammad Abdul Karim Khan And Ors. vs Bishan Sahai And Ors.
Judges:
22 March, 1929·6. The pleas in defence were (1) res judicata, estoppel and (3) existence of legal necessity. There was also a denial of the pedigree set up by the plaintiff's. 7. The learned Subordinate Judge has found that the plaintiffs' pedigree is proved and that there was legal necessity for some of the trans...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Genda Mal vs Narsingh Das
Judges:
22 March, 1929·JUDGMENT 1. A preliminary objection has been taken to the hearing of this appeal. Certain property was advertised for sale and being non-ancestral the civil Court accepted the estimate of the value of the property made by the decree-holder at Rs. 500. Being a revenue-paying property the sale was con...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nadir Shah vs The Municipal Board
Judges: Banerji, King
21 March, 1929·4. The plaintiff commenced work and on the 8th of October, 1923, the Municipal Engineer directed the work to be stopped until further orders. What had happened was that on the 7th of October, 1923, a meeting had been convened by Mr. Rya D. Chairman of the Water Works Committee, in connection with th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tahir Husain And Ors. vs Ikram Khan
Judges:
21 March, 1929·1. This is a reference made by the Commissioner of Benares under the Municipalities Act asking us for a decision as to whether Muhammad Ekram, who has been returned as a member of the Benares Municipal Board election, was qualified as voter. It is not the practice of this or any other Court to give ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhoopal Rai And Anr. vs Shiam Sunder Lal And Ors.
Judges:
20 March, 1929·9. The Court held that the plaintiff as vendee of the assignee of the muafidar was entitled to sue in the revenue Courts under Section 161 coupled with Section 166, Agra Ten. Act. It also held that the suit was not barred by the provisions of Act 23 of 1871. It observed that: Section 9 of the said A...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Jangilal vs Unknown
Judges: K Young, King
20 March, 1929·5. The Board of Revenue are of opinion that Article 40 is applicable but three learned Judges of the Chief Court of Oudh have recently held that a similar security bond furnished under Order XLI, Rule 6 was chargeable under Article 57, Stamp Reference No. 2 of 1927 decided on the 8th December, 1927 ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Stamp Reference (Jangilal) vs Unknown
Judges:
20 March, 1929·6. The Board of Revenue are of opinion that Article 40 is applicable, but three learned Judges of the Chief Court of Oudh have recently held that a similar security bond furnished under Order 41, Rule 6, was chargeable under Article 57: Harihar Partab v. Bisheshar Bakhsh A.I.R. 1928 Oudh 143. So far...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Partap Singh vs Hemraj And Ors.
Judges:
20 March, 1929·1. This is a second appeal in which the plaintiffs challenge the decision of the Subordinate Judge of Saharanpur reversing the finding of the Munsif of Saharanpur on a question of easement. The plaintiffs claim that they have for many years irrigated certain numbers from a well situate in the abadi ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Fazal Ahmad vs R.B.S. Har Prasad And Ors.
Judges:
19 March, 1929·12. There was an agreement between Manzur Ahmad, the vendor and Mt. Rahim Bibi, the vendee that Rs. 1,90,000 would be spent on 'charitable purposes.' In pursuance of that agreement she assigns certain properties to charities by making waqf of them. The charities or God Almighty received to that exte...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.