Punjab Sugar Mills, Co., Ltd. vs Lachhman Prasad And Ors.
Judges:
28 June, 1929·3. The defendant has appealed and the plaintiff has filed a cross appeal. There can be no doubt that the manufacture of sugar whether it be the extraction of sugar juice from sugarcane or the refinement of sugar is a manufacturing industry but the, question is whether the defendant is entitled to th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhikam Prasad vs Rani Indumati
Judges:
28 June, 1929·JUDGMENT Dalal, J. 1. The plaintiffs are purchasers of a grove from the defendant Rani Indumati and sued for possession because in mutation proceedings she and other defendants objected to the entry of the plaintiff's names against the grove in suit. Both the Subordinate Courts have dismissed the su...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghubir Chaube And Anr. vs Gauri Chaube And Ors.
Judges:
28 June, 1929·3. It has been laid down in Muhammad, Ibrahim v. Ram Krisha Rai [1912] 10 A.L.J. 95 and Debi Prasad v. Bhagwan Din [1912] 35 All. 27 that on a sale of a share in a mahal the vendor becomes the exproprietary tenant of all the cosharers in sir plots and not merely the exproprietary tenant of the vende...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
(Bohra) Kanhaiya Lal vs Girwar And Ors.
Judges:
28 June, 1929·1. This appeal must be allowed. It is impossible to contest the proposition that the onus of establishing title by reason of possession for a certain requisite period lies upon the person asserting such possession. In other words, the burden of proving title by adverse possession lies upon the perso...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bohra Kanhaiya Lal vs Girwar And Ors.
Judges: Bennet, I Ahmad
28 June, 1929·2. The findings of the lower Appellate Court in the present case are that the plaintiff's title to the property in dispute has been proved, and that the evidence of both parties as regards possession is worthless. On these findings, in our judgment, the plaintiff was entitled to a decree. 3. The art...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghubir Chaube And Anr. vs Gauri Chaube And Ors.
Judges: Bennet, I Ahmad
28 June, 1929·Newaz Chaube was a co sharer in this mahal and he mortgaged the zemindari to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs brought a suit on this mortgage and got a foreclosure decree and purchased the share of Newaz Chaube. Newaz Chaube had certain sir lands in this mahal and he became the ex-proprietary tenant o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jugul Kishore vs Banwari Lal And Ors.
Judges:
28 June, 1929·1. This is a second appeal by the defendant on a very simple point. The defendant bought certain property at an auction-sale on 20th December 1918, for a price which has not been disclosed but is said to be between Rs. 300 and 400. The same proclamation sets out that property was subject to a prior ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Ajaib vs Noor Khan And Ors.
Judges:
28 June, 1929·1. This is an appeal by the defendant in a suit for recovery of possession of four plots of land and Rs. 156 as mesne profits. 2. Nur Khan, Ismail Khan and Mustaqim the three plaintiffs and one Wazira were the joint occupancy tenants of a certain holding which included the four plots in dispute. By ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jeot Ram Chaudhari vs Mt. Lauji And Anr.
Judges:
28 June, 1929·1. This appeal involves a question of law which has not so far been specifically decided by this Court. The plaintiff Mt. Lauji is the widow of a predeceased son of one Abhilakh who owned 2 annas self-acquired property Admittedly this property was acquired by Abhilakh subsequent to the death of Dubr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
L. Bhagwan Das vs Town Magistrate And Ors.
Judges: Sen
27 June, 1929·3. The defendants Nos. 2 to 4 contested the suit on the ground that the platform had been in existence for more than 20 years and that the plaintiff's suit was liable to dismissal because he had not suffered any special damage beyond what he did in common with all other members of the public affecte...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.