Suraj Pal Singh vs Shib Lal
Judges:
10 July, 1929·JUDGMENT 1. This is an appeal by Raj Suraj Pal Singh of Awagarh from an order directing the discharge of Shib Lal, an insolvent. 2. Shib Lal was adjudicated an insolvent in November 1925. The amount of the scheduled debts came to about Rs. 18,500, out of which the debts for which the insolvent was r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sukhdarshan Prakash vs Ram Das
Judges:
10 July, 1929·1. On 24th April 1921, a suit was instituted by Ram Das against Sukhdarshan Prakash, for recovery of certain sums of money. On 1st September, Ram Das obtained a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from transferring his immovable property pending the decision of the suit. That interim inju...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Reoti Lal And Anr. vs Shiam Lal And Ors.
Judges:
10 July, 1929·1. On Mr. U.S. Bajpai's application for the admission of this appeal Dr. Katju was present, and though he had no locus standi to intervene, this Court premitted him to do so in order that this matter, which is one of extreme urgency, could be discussed by both parties. The application for admission ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Beni Din And Ors. vs Ram Naresh And Anr.
Judges:
10 July, 1929·3. The learned Subordinate Judge, has believed the evidence of the two witnesses Jagannath and Mahadeo Singh produced by the plaintiffs particularly that of Jagannath which was to the effect that the brothers separated from each other in the lifetime of Iswar Din under the said arrangement and got p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganeshi Lal vs Chob Singh And Ors.
Judges:
09 July, 1929·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit for pre-emption. The plaintiff owns khewat 7 which consists of an isolated plot which is a resumed muafi. The property sold consists of plots in khewat 18 which also are resumed muafi lands. The learned Judge has found that these are petty propri...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Lachhman Prosad Babu Ram Of ... vs Unknown
Judges:
09 July, 1929·19. And again at p. 93: It is the most natural and genuine exposition of a statute to construe one part of a statute by another part of the same statute for that best expresseth the meaning of the makers.... 20. Again, at p. 93 the learned author quotes the following from a case, decided by Sir John...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Lachhman Prosad Babu Ram Of ... vs Unknown
Judges: Boys, Kendall, Young, Mukerji, Niamatullah
09 July, 1929·5. The Assistant Commissioner also said in his order dated 15th June, 1928, which is printed as Appendix D to the Income-tax Officer's statement of the case "and there was the failure to produce the Calcutta accounts for which a notice was issued on 11th August 1927." 6. These circumstances clearly ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Mahmuda Bibi vs Sayed Abdul Hamid And Anr.
Judges: S M Sulaiman, Pullan
09 July, 1929·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit for pre-emption. The lower Appellate Court has dismissed the suit on the ground that the plaintiff is in the position of a mortgagee and not a proprietor and is, therefore, not a co-sharer entitled to pre-empt. It has further held that a deed whi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bashir Husain vs Mohammad Ali And Ors.
Judges:
09 July, 1929·JUDGMENT Sen, J. 1. The facts of the case clearly show that the suit, as framed by the plaintiff, was misconceived and that the civil Court was not competent to grant the reliefs claimed by the plaintiff in the suit. The plaintiff came to the Court on the allegation that in mauza Inampur, mahal Safe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shujauddin Khan vs Mehdi Raza
Judges:
09 July, 1929·1. This is an appeal by a defendant lambardar against a decree of the lower appellate Court awarding the plaintiff-respondent Rs. 2,569-2-9 for the plaintiff's share of the profits under Section 164, Act 2 of 1901. The plaintiff sued for his share of profits for 1328, 1329 and 1330 Faslis. The plain...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.