Rup Kishore vs Collector Of Etah And Ors.
Judges:
16 July, 1929·The Court may in its discretion adjourn any sale hereunder to a specified,, day and hour and the officer conducting any such sale may in his discretion adjourn the sale recording his reasons for such adjournment. 3. It is clear to me that this rule so far as it relates to the officer conducting the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dip Chand vs Munni Lal And Anr.
Judges:
16 July, 1929·4. It is argued by the learned Counsel for the appellant that Article 44 applies to every case in which a transfer has been made by guardian of a minor and, if a suit to set aside an alienation made by such guardian is not brought by the ward within three years of his attaining majority, a decree fo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sant Lal And Anr. vs Lala Raj Narain, Creditor And ...
Judges: Young, Sen
15 July, 1929·JUDGMENT 1. In this case Sant Lal was adjudicated a bankrupt on the 26th of March, 1926. He was ordered, as is usual, to apply for discharge within six months. On the 18th of October, 1926, he applied for his discharge. Notice of this application was served on Raj Narain, the only creditor. On the 1...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mukhtar Ahmad vs Lachman Prasad
Judges:
15 July, 1929·JUDGMENT Dalal, J. 1. The Subordinate Courts certainly had jurisdiction in this matter. The plaintiff held a decree against one Jhandoo a tenant of the defendant Mukhtar Ahmad. What Jhandoo did was to get up a fictitious distraint by the zamindar and thereby fraudulently prevented the plaintiff from...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M. Abdullah Khan vs Kanhaiya And Ors.
Judges:
15 July, 1929·3. The Court of first instance held that the defendant were trespassers in respect of certain plots but were cosharers in two khewats, viz-, Nos. 50 and 51. In the result, the learned Assistant Collector decreed the suit in respect of lands situated in khewats other than Nos. 50 and 51 and dismissed...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Baldeo And Ors. vs Muloo
Judges: Sen
15 July, 1929·LACHIRAM | -------------------------------- 2. It appears that Lachhi Ram, the common ancestor, was the original tenant of the occupancy holding now in dispute. Upon his death, the holding was jointly cultivated by Chheda Lal and Duli, his two sons. Chheda Lal appears to have left the parent village...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Santi Lal And Anr. vs Raj Narain And Anr.
Judges:
15 July, 1929·JUDGMENT 1. In this case Sant Lal was adjudicated a bankrupt on 26th March 1926. He was ordered as is usual to apply for discharge within six months. On 18th October 1926, he applied for his discharge. Notice of this application was served on Raj Narain, the only creditor. On 13th December 1926, no ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramji Lal vs Firm Ram Chand-Dwarka Das And Ors.
Judges: Dalal
12 July, 1929·JUDGMENT Dalal, J. 1. Unfortunately the respondents are not represented. The plea of the auction-purchaser appears to be correct that the Court of Small Causes had no jurisdiction to set aside a sale of moveable property on the ground of irregularity in publishing and conducting the sale. It is laid...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kishun Mal vs Sakal Raj Mal
Judges:
12 July, 1929·3. Whether the complaint brought by Sakal Raj Mal against the plaintiffs in both cases was false to his knowledge? 4. In my opinion this was not a correct point for determination. The law has now been laid down in great detail by their Lordships of the Privy Council in Balbhaddar v. Badri Sah A.I.R....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Madan Kishor And Anr. vs Mahabir Prasad And Ors.
Judges:
12 July, 1929·JUDGMENT Dalal, J. 1. The regular Court had no jurisdiction. The suit for a small amount of money was certainly triable by a Court of Small Causes. The lower appellate Court was of opinion that the case was one of mischief, if not of theft and, therefore, barred from the jurisdiction of the Court of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.