Baijnath vs Dhani Ram
Judges:
26 April, 1929·1. This is a second appeal by one who was the defendant in the suit. The parties to the suit, at one stage of it agreed that the learned Munsif before whom the suit was, should decide the case, after hearing certain documentary evidence and making an inspection of the locality. They agreed that they...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gajadhar And Ors. vs Chunni Lal And Ors.
Judges:
26 April, 1929·JUDGMENT 1. This is an application to revise an order of the learned Munsif of Mainpuri dated 4th July 1927, by which he accepted an award and directed that a decree be framed in terms of it. It appears from the applicants before us, the defendants in the suit and the plaintiff agreed to refer their...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Girwar Singh vs Shah Ram Chander
Judges:
26 April, 1929·1. This is a defendant's application in revision purporting to have been made under Section 115, Civil P.C., and arises under the following circumstances: 2. The plaintiff, who is the respondent in this Court, brought a suit against the applicant for recovery of a certain amount of money, which was ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Faqir Chand vs Lala Harkishun Das
Judges:
26 April, 1929·JUDGMENT 1. The respondent brought a suit, in the Court of the Munsif of Bareilly, against the applicant, in which 17th January 1928 was fixed for fixing of issues. On that date the case was called, the plaintiff was found absent and the suit was dismissed for default. The same day, the plaintiff ap...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pokh Pal And Anr. vs Lal Madho Ram
Judges:
25 April, 1929·JUDGMENT Dalal, J. 1. The plaintiff Madho Ram while he was recorded as lambardar of a certain property paid a certain sum of money as revenue on citation being issued to him by the revenue authorities. At that time though recorded as lambardar he had sold his property to the defendants who were real...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chhotey Lal vs Bansi Dhar And Ors.
Judges:
25 April, 1929·The result is that the objections are allowed with costs. The objector in my view is quite within his right to enforce a proportionate amount of his charge in respect of the property in dispute. 3. As a question arises in this appeal as to what were the "objections" of the judgment-debtor which were...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiam Lal vs Moti Ram And Ors.
Judges:
25 April, 1929·JUDGMENT 1. This application in revision must be allowed. The plaintiff Shyam Lal sued for recovery of possession over certain properties. The parties agreed that they would abide by a statement made by a certain gentleman, Khem Chand. Mr. Khem Chand made a statement to the effect that if defendant ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hoshiar Singh vs Udai Ram Singh And Ors.
Judges:
24 April, 1929·JUDGMENT 1. This is an application to revise a judgment passed by a Judge, Small Cause Court. The facts are briefly these. The plaintiff was one of several partners in a firm. Two of the members of the firm executed a promissory note in plaintiff's favour agreeing to pay him a certain sum of money a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B. Sheo Prasad Singh vs Muffassil Bank Ltd.
Judges:
22 April, 1929·1. This is a judgment-debtor's appeal arising out of proceedings in execution of a simple money decree obtained by the decree-holder under the following circumstances: 2. On 6th April 1920, the appellant executed a deed of mortgage in favour of the decree-holder for Rs. 6,000. The appellant was a me...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surajmal And Anr. vs Shankar And Ors.
Judges:
22 April, 1929·1. This is a defendants' appeal arising out of a suit for pre-emption. Before the sale took place a notice was sent by registered post to the plaintiffs, but the lower appellate Court has found that this was not actually served on them. The defendants appealed and on their behalf a ground was taken ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.