Khan Sahai And Anr. vs Mahurmun And Ors.
Judges:
22 March, 1926·JUDGMENT 1. This was a suit for the recovery of money due on a mortgage purporting to have been effected by Chhunni, Sitaram, Nakrarn and Bhagirath, sons of Harimal, in favour of Sumer, on the 8th January 1879. The mortgage-deed provided for the payment of the mortgage-money within 15 years and it f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B. Jagmohan Das And Ors. vs Kunwar Singh And Ors.
Judges:
19 March, 1926·3. The trial Court found that the property in question representing the Bela factory and the village Sheopurwa, including the tenancy and mortgagee rights appertaining thereto, had been purchased by Jagmohan Das and Baijnath Das for an inadequate value, and that the consent of Bisheshar Prasad, the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Kishore Singh And Anr. vs Jai Mangal Singh And Ors.
Judges:
19 March, 1926·2. The plaintiffs and defendants are grandsons of two brothers and owned a certain revenue-paying property in equal shares. They also held sir land jointly in the village. In 1906 the father of the plaintiffs mortgaged his share of the zamindari property, including the sir rights, to the father of t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahbub Ali Khan vs Chiddan And Anr.
Judges:
19 March, 1926·3. It appears to me that on the finding of the Courts below that the plots in suit are portions of groves, the plaintiff's suit must fail. On behalf of the respondents the finding of the lower Courts had not been disputed. The whole matter is made clear by the statement filed by the patwari which wa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jawahir Singh vs Jahan Singh And Ors.
Judges: Sulaiman, P C Banerji
18 March, 1926·1. This is a plaintiffs appeal arising oat of a suit for preemption. In support of his allegation that a custom of preemption exists in the village, the plaintiff produced the wajib-ul-arz of 1279' Fasli. The defendants produced the wajib-ul-arz of 1262 Fasli and a dustur dehi of the year 1307 Fasli...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muhammad Ali Khan And Ors. vs Emperor
Judges:
18 March, 1926·1. This is an application for revision of an order convicting the applicants under Sections 3 and 4 of the Public Gambling Act (Act III of 1867). The main ground on which the application is pressed is that the Magistrate who issued the search warrant should not have tried the case. The trying Magist...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Naurang Rai And Ors. vs Ram Sumer Rai And Anr.
Judges:
18 March, 1926·JUDGMENT 1. This is a defendant's appeal arising out of a suit for pre-emption. The plaintiff is a donee of a share from a Hindu widow, who was recorded as a proprietor. On a suit brought by the reversioners, it was declared, subsequent to the passing of the first Court's decree in the pre-emption s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Misra Mendai Lal And Ors. vs Dularey Lal And Ors.
Judges: G Mears, Lindsay
17 March, 1926·1. In the lower Court this was a suit for recovery of Rs. 32,427, being "principal and interest alleged to be due under a mortgage-bond, dated the 23rd of October 1902. 2. The learned Subordinate Judge came to the conclusion that he would have to eliminate all calculation of interest on the principa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhawani Prasad vs King-Emperor
Judges:
17 March, 1926·JUDGMENT Sulaiman, J. 1. This application for revision has been pressed on the facts and on one legal ground. 2. On the facts the accused has had a careful ferial in two Courts and there is no reason to admit the revision. He is charged with forging an application for a privilege ticket in the name ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Collector Of Bareilly vs Sultan Ahmad Khan
Judges:
16 March, 1926·2. The first ground of appeal is that this is too much. We are of opinion that it is not and we are fortified in our view by the judgment of this Court delivered by another Bench in the connected appeal No. 430 of 1922. 3. The next point argued is that the 15 per cent, awarded by the learned Distric...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.