Ram Sahai Singh vs Debi Din
Judges:
15 June, 1926·18. Two questions arise: (1) Is there ground in the Act for believing that the Legislature intended to include in the Act mortgages between members of the same tribe, and, as on that basis Section 10 will be undoubtedly applicable to forbid a sale of the property under a decree or order of the civil...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Prasad vs Balwant Singh And Ors.
Judges:
15 June, 1926·6. I do not consider that the word "independent" used by their Lordships implies that there should be no connexion of any kind whatsoever between the two debts. It merely means that they should not be part of the same transaction, or the means of some device. Of course, when one debt is paid off by ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Laiq Singh vs Jagdish Singh And Anr.
Judges:
15 June, 1926·1. This was a suit brought by Laiq Singh against one Jagdish Singh and Mt. Gori Dulahin, widow of one Hamir Singh. The points that had to be decided in the case were mainly whether one Hamir Singh had been adopted by Baldeo Singh, but the most important question of all was whether on the 4th Novembe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sita Ram And Ors. vs King-Emperor
Judges:
15 June, 1926·1. This is pre-eminently a case for decision by the civil Court and not by the Criminal Court and although the learned Magistrate who heard the appeal, has taken upon himself the duty, of congratulating Mr. Toder Mal on the judgment', I am unable to congratulate either the District Magistrate on his...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jugal Kishore And Ors. vs Khuda Bux And Ors.
Judges:
15 June, 1926·2. The cause of action of these five Vaishes of Moradabad, as set out in the plaint, is that without any reasonable and lawful ground, Maulvi Shams ud-din, the Tahsildar of Moradabad, prohibited and interfered with the bathing of the public and drawing water in a lota from the well and with the draw...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dwarka Singh And Ors. vs Sheo Shankar Singh And Ors.
Judges:
14 June, 1926·2. We find it difficult to accept the view of the Court below that there is no prima facie evidence to prove the existence of a custom. The district is a permanently settled district and with the exception of a revisional settlement there has been no settlement since 1842, when the last wajib-ul-arz...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nihal And Ors. vs King-Emperor
Judges:
14 June, 1926·1. This is an application in revision by six parsons named Nihal, Shama, Ghubbar, Mukhtar, Meda and Bhoja, who were bound over to be of good behaviour by a Magistrate of the First Class of Bijnor. The procedure adopted in this case was this. On the 2nd of December 1925, the Station Officer of Chandp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Nawasi Begam And Anr. vs Mt. Dilfaroz Begam
Judges:
09 June, 1926·3. The Court below, relying mainly upon the decision of this High Court, in the case of Maina Bibi v. Wasi Ahmad [1919] 41 All. 538, held that the present suit was not barred by reason of the fact that the plaintiff's predecessor-in-interest had obtained a decree for possession of the said property ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hashmat Hussain And Ors. vs Siddiq Hasan And Ors.
Judges:
09 June, 1926·2. On the 11th September 1920, thirteen persons, describing themselves as the representatives of the Shia community, entered into an agreement of reference to arbitration in regard to that mosque and appointed Mr. W.A. Silberrad, the then Collector of Saharanpur, as arbitrator to determine, after in...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lalta Prashad vs Jagdish Narain And Ors.
Judges:
09 June, 1926·5. In order to appreciate the precise bearing of the various transactions entered into by the vendors it is necessary to go into some of the attendant circumstances in detail. The house in dispute stands contiguous to a temple, and originally belonged to the persons by whom that temple was founded. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.