B. Kishen Prasad And Anr. vs Kunj Behari Lal
Judges:
28 October, 1925·4. The questions accordingly arise before us for decision. First, whether the executing Court had any jurisdiction to interfere with the terms of the compromise, supposing the terms were such as would enable the Court to interfere with under Section 74 of the Contract Act or on principles of equity ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdullah vs Badr-Ul-Islam
Judges:
23 October, 1925·3. The Wajibularz sets out that persons in Clause 1, that is to say those who are "sharif" have a right to transfer "pukhta houses which they have built at their own expenses." The right of transfer is expressed to be a right to transfer the houses as they stand. In this connexion it is also to be n...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Ram Kuer vs Govind Ram And Ors.
Judges:
22 October, 1925·3. It appears that on the 22nd of November 1884 one Pahar Singh executed a mortgage in favour of four persons, one of whom was Ram Prasad. The amount of the mortgage money was Rs. 1,000 and admittedly Ram Prasad was interested in this money to the extent of one-fifth only. 4. On the 17th of October ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Newaz And Anr. vs Nankoo And Ors.
Judges:
22 October, 1925·1. This is the appeal of the plaintiffs who had instituted a suit as reversioners of one Ram Charan for the possession of 2 bighas of land. In 1884 Ram Charan appears to have been in difficulties and he had a 9-pie odd share in a certain village. He executed a sale-deed which has had to be construed...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghunath Kandu vs Emperor
Judges:
22 October, 1925·2. The Tahsildar Magistrate found that the accused's act did not come under Section 34 of the Police Act and it was an offence under Section 290 of the Indian Penal Code. He, therefore, convicted applicant under the latter section and fined him Rs. 10. Applicant preferred an appeal which was dismiss...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Ram Kuer vs Govind Ram And Ors.
Judges: G Mears, Lindsay
22 October, 1925·4. On the 17th of October 1890 Pahar Singh the mortgagor sold some other property of his to three of these mortgagees and he left with them a sum of Rs. 938 in order to discharge the mortgage of 1884, It has been found and has not been questioned that Rs. 938 represented the full amount of the mortg...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Nath Singh And Anr. vs Gajadhar Lal
Judges:
22 October, 1925·2. Two pleas have been urged: (1) that the sale deed of 1888, which forms the basis of the plaintiff's title to Plots Nos. 2876, 2877 and 2883, was invalid for want of registration; (2) that the findings of the lower appellate Court do not warrant its awarding to the plaintiff the trees of Nos. 2903...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Nath Singh Alias Lal Singh And ... vs Gajadhar Lal
Judges: Daniels
22 October, 1925·2. Two pleas have been urged: (1) that the sale-deed of 1888 which forms the basis of the plaintiff's title to plots NOS. 2876, 2877 and. 2883 was invalid for want of registration; (2) that the findings of the lower Appellate Court do not warrant its awarding to the plaintiff the trees of Nos. 2903 ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Newaz And Anr. vs Nankoo And Ors.
Judges: G Mears, Lindsay
22 October, 1925·1. This is the appeal of the plaintiffs who had instituted a suit as reversioners of one Ram Charan for the possession of 2 bighas of land. In 1884 Ram Charan appears to have been in difficulties and he had a 9-pie odd share in a certain village. He executed a sale-deed which has had to be construed...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jhabbu Ram vs Bahoran Singh And Ors.
Judges:
22 October, 1925·1. This is an appeal by a defendant-mortgagee arising out of a suit for partition of certain properties. Originally a mortgage was made by Ram Dhan, the plaintiffs' grandfather, in the year 1902 in favour of the mortgagee's predecessor. Subsequently, after the grandfather's death and in the year 191...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.